Subscribe
-
Recent posts
- Syria – and the ‘Responsibility to Protect’: …whom, how, when?
- Christchurch’s assets could be next on Govt chopping block
- Can’t or won’t?
- General debate, February 10, 2012
- Unemployment: one step forward, two steps back
- Government cherry-picks research to justify school class size increases
- Waitangi Wisdom
- The NZ Government on Syria: “not helpful to go into detail; rather wider than I would care to go…”
- Super Fund invests in Chinese property bubble?
- Waitangi Day Speech to Kapiti
- A stingy and evidence-averse decision on the minimum wage
- Member’s Bills drawn
Recent comments
- phil u (6:26 pm): more on that yesterdays’ news thang.. ..3 news just found the solar...
- toad (6:11 pm): @Elsie 5:42 PM …central government is rather concerned about possible...
- darkhorse (6:05 pm): no body in treasury seems to notice that the infrastructure user and the...
- phil u (5:42 pm): he is the sideshow bob to brownlees’ quimby… phil@whoar.
- Elsie (5:42 pm): I suspect, Toad, that central government is rather concerned about possible...
- phil u (5:37 pm): “..Wonder what cushion Brownlee’s providing for Parker to land...
- toad (5:33 pm): @Elsie 5:25 PM Perhaps they can sell off unneeded liabilities. And who is going...
- Elsie (5:31 pm): They should indeed pay tax on speculation. I do wonder why you didn’t...
- Elsie (5:25 pm): An earthquake levy, of the type proposed by the Green Party, would raise $1...
- nznative (4:55 pm): Surely its Misanthropic Curmudgeon who is joking with his fantasy comment...
Like us?
Recommendations
Popular on Reddit
Posts by author
Categories
Tags
ACC Auckland Catherine Delahunty China climate change coal conservation cycling dairy David Clendon economy Education Emissions Trading Scheme energy environment ETS farming Food Gareth Hughes general debate gerry brownlee global warming human rights Jeanette Fitzsimons john key Keith Locke Kennedy Graham Kevin Hague Metiria Turei mining national national party Nick Smith oil Parliament Paula Bennett peak oil politics public transport rodney hide Russel Norman Sue Bradford Sue Kedgley transport waterArchives
Blogs
- Auckland Trains
- Auckland Transport Blog
- Bibliophilia
- Boganette
- Bowalley Road
- Cactus Kate
- Capitalism bad, Tree pretty
- change.blog.change
- Dread Times
- envirohistory NZ
- Fare-Free New Zealand
- fearfactsexposed
- Fighting Talk
- Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog
- Frankly Speaking
- g.blog
- Gordon Campbell
- Grist
- Hot Topic
- Ideologically Impure
- Imperator Fish
- In a strange land
- Janlogie's blog
- Just Left
- Kennedy Graham
- Kiwiblog
- Kiwipolitico
- KJT
- liberation
- Life and Politics
- Local Bodies
- MacDoctor
- Make Wealth History
- Mars 2 Earth
- Maui Street
- No Right Turn
- Open Parachute
- Poneke
- Public Address
- Pundit
- put 'em all on an island
- Reading the Maps
- Real Climate
- Red Alert
- Robert Guyton
- Socialist Aotearoa
- The Campaign for Better Transport
- The Dim Post
- The dullest blog in the world
- The Hand Mirror
- The Oil Drum
- The Standard
- Thorndon Bubble
- Treehugger
- Truth Seeker
- Tumeke!
- well sharp
- Whale Oil
- Whoar.co.nz
- WorldChanging
- Worldwatch Institute
Green parties
Media
- Aotearoa Indymedia
- Audrey Young
- Colin Espiner
- Economist
- George Monbiot
- good
- Green World Press Review
- Guardian
- Harpers
- hugg
- NBR
- New York Review of Books
- New Zealand Listener
- NZ Herald
- NZFrog
- Reuters World Environment News
- Scoop
- Slate
- Spectator
- Stuff
- The Green Room
- The New Yorker
- The revolution will not be televised – a radio show
vocational independence Archive
-
More questions than answers over ACC cost shifting - by Kevin Hague
A couple of months ago, following ACC Minister Nick Smith’s u-turn on counselling for ACC sexual abuse claimants, I called for an independent review of the wide-ranging cutbacks to ACC imposed by the Government. I have now asked some questions about people being moved from ACC to welfare benefits. What really disturbed me about the replies is the huge increase in the number of people being shifted from weekly compensation onto welfare benefits since March 2009. read moreOctober 6, 2010 4:39 pm - 8 Comments -
An ACC model for welfare? No thanks - by frog
Over the weekend, Social Development Minister raised the prospect of an ACC model for sickness and invalid’s benefits. My bet is that Bennett is talking about moving sickness and invalid’s benefits to the insurance model that ACC is increasingly becoming based on, rather than to a model based on the Woodhouse principle of complete rehabilitation that it was founded on. read moreMay 31, 2010 10:35 am - 5 Comments -
Faux savings from gutting ACC - by frog
Shunting injured people off ACC onto welfare benefits where they may languish for years rather than rehabilitating them into employment is a false saving – as bad for the economy as it is for the injured person. read moreDecember 3, 2009 1:52 pm - 7 Comments -
Nick Smith: I don’t know and I don’t care - by frog
Nick Smith doesn’t know the most basic statistical information necessary to determine the likely extent of cost containment or the impact on claimants of going back to the 1999 work capacity policy. What’s more, he’s not even prepared to have ACC do the analysis to find out. What a shambles! read moreDecember 3, 2009 9:59 am - 2 Comments -
Gutting ACC – it’s just not fair: Vocational independence - by frog
This is the first in a series of blog posts I’m doing to explain National’s plans to gut ACC and highlight how unfair they are. One of the proposed changes is to vocational independence assessments. These assessments are used by ACC to decide if an ACC claimant receiving weekly compensation for loss of earnings is [...] read moreOctober 16, 2009 9:41 am - 9 Comments
