Subscribe
-
Recent posts
- General debate, February 10, 2012
- Unemployment: one step forward, two steps back
- Government cherry-picks research to justify school class size increases
- Waitangi Wisdom
- The NZ Government on Syria: “not helpful to go into detail; rather wider than I would care to go…”
- Super Fund invests in Chinese property bubble?
- Waitangi Day Speech to Kapiti
- A stingy and evidence-averse decision on the minimum wage
- Member’s Bills drawn
- A nation divided?
- General debate, February 4, 2012
- Public education under attack
Recent comments
- Andrew Atkin (11:24 am): Andrew’s little adventure at school: Ok. When I was in the fourth...
- Jackal (10:55 am): So who are the real clowns?
- phil u (10:24 am): “…Finally, and perhaps more controversially, the new...
- phil u (10:09 am): one was the vids of the northern lights..shot from space..(available...
- eric (10:03 am): Hi Andrew After watching your link I am saddened by the amount of people who...
- Suz (9:44 am): Damn..so all the money spent on one-on-one tutors for my son was a waste! Should...
- dbuckley (9:18 am): non-elite maori and non-elite pakeha have to work/join together… What an...
- dbuckley (9:09 am): For heavens sake Phil, if you’re going to wave your willy, at least...
- dbuckley (9:08 am): It’s an interesting question, but ultimately, as the lovely Mona Lisa...
- phil u (8:50 am): i hafta say it does perk up my morning.. ..when i see breakfast news...
Like us?
Recommendations
Popular on Reddit
Posts by author
Categories
Tags
ACC Auckland Catherine Delahunty China climate change coal conservation cycling dairy David Clendon economy Education Emissions Trading Scheme energy environment ETS farming Food Gareth Hughes general debate gerry brownlee global warming human rights Jeanette Fitzsimons john key Keith Locke Kennedy Graham Kevin Hague Metiria Turei mining national national party Nick Smith oil Parliament Paula Bennett peak oil politics public transport rodney hide Russel Norman Sue Bradford Sue Kedgley transport waterArchives
Blogs
- Auckland Trains
- Auckland Transport Blog
- Bibliophilia
- Boganette
- Bowalley Road
- Cactus Kate
- Capitalism bad, Tree pretty
- change.blog.change
- Dread Times
- envirohistory NZ
- Fare-Free New Zealand
- fearfactsexposed
- Fighting Talk
- Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog
- Frankly Speaking
- g.blog
- Gordon Campbell
- Grist
- Hot Topic
- Ideologically Impure
- Imperator Fish
- In a strange land
- Janlogie's blog
- Just Left
- Kennedy Graham
- Kiwiblog
- Kiwipolitico
- KJT
- liberation
- Life and Politics
- Local Bodies
- MacDoctor
- Make Wealth History
- Mars 2 Earth
- Maui Street
- No Right Turn
- Open Parachute
- Poneke
- Public Address
- Pundit
- put 'em all on an island
- Reading the Maps
- Real Climate
- Red Alert
- Robert Guyton
- Socialist Aotearoa
- The Campaign for Better Transport
- The Dim Post
- The dullest blog in the world
- The Hand Mirror
- The Oil Drum
- The Standard
- Thorndon Bubble
- Treehugger
- Truth Seeker
- Tumeke!
- well sharp
- Whale Oil
- Whoar.co.nz
- WorldChanging
- Worldwatch Institute
Green parties
Media
- Aotearoa Indymedia
- Audrey Young
- Colin Espiner
- Economist
- George Monbiot
- good
- Green World Press Review
- Guardian
- Harpers
- hugg
- NBR
- New York Review of Books
- New Zealand Listener
- NZ Herald
- NZFrog
- Reuters World Environment News
- Scoop
- Slate
- Spectator
- Stuff
- The Green Room
- The New Yorker
- The revolution will not be televised – a radio show
s 59 Archive
-
Children’s policy - by frog
Sue Bradford has just released the Green Party’s Children’s Policy on the eve of the Every Child Counts Conference which starts tomorrow. As expected the policy signals the Greens will work to retain the amendments to s 59 of the Crimes Act. It also has important health provisions (such as free dental care), environmental provisions [...] read moreSeptember 9, 2008 12:13 pm - 67 Comments -
4 ways to smack - by frog
John Caldwell has taken the seemingly unusual step of reading the child discipline laws in the Crimes Act before rushing to comment on the section 59 amendment petition and referendum. Thus his commentary in The Press yesterday morning [off line] is enlightening. It seems we do not currently have an anti-smacking law but a law [...] read moreAugust 27, 2008 6:46 am - 36 Comments -
Euphemisms - by frog
It’s funny the debate was meant to be about removing a defence against the criminal assault of children. But opponents didn’t like that language so instead we spent a lot of time talking about “smacking”. Now we’re being subjected to a further amendment of language away from the actual legal definition of what we are [...] read moreAugust 25, 2008 10:34 am - 60 Comments
