Subscribe
-
Recent posts
- Powerlessness is not a basis for recovery
- The death of public broadcasting?
- DisengAGEd Chch and youth participation
- Round(ing)Up Auckland’s weeds? Who decides?
- Claiming “Fascination of Plants Day” from GE peddlers
- The Ministers respond to the Christchurch housing crisis…
- Beyond Today: a values story, and the Greens’ story
- EEZ Bill makes risky deep-sea drilling E-Z
- Disability, fairness and care issues
- Ireland to also ban fracking
- Congratulations Keith
- General debate, May 13, 2012
Recent comments
- fin (4:04 pm): Not exactly a green issue, but if this news article is even half true, I reckon...
- Gregor W (3:36 pm): A snippet on the government’s proposed asset selloff @ interest.co.nz....
- Gregor W (2:50 pm): @ Sam This ‘sideshow’ has been a basis of a couple of hundred years of...
- Sam Buchanan (1:37 pm): As a non-TV watcher, I don’t really feel terrified or concerned,...
- Jackal (10:21 am): Fonterra environmental bullies I enjoy watching Rural Delivery in the...
- Trevor29 (8:18 am): Tony – an increase in the price of electricity will encourage...
- Trevor29 (8:12 am): A CO2 charge applied at the smoke stack of power companies wouldn’t be...
- sprout (11:18 pm): Searching for the perfect power company is like searching for the Holy Grail...
- Tony (11:01 pm): Kerry, I don’t quite understand how taxing producers but compensating...
- Tony (10:56 pm): Fair enough BJ, but leave nuclear power out. Please. I don’t think any...
Like us?
Recommendations
Popular on Reddit
Posts by author
Categories
Tags
ACC Auckland Catherine Delahunty China climate change coal conservation cycling dairy David Clendon economy Education Emissions Trading Scheme energy environment ETS farming Food Gareth Hughes general debate gerry brownlee global warming human rights Jeanette Fitzsimons john key Keith Locke Kennedy Graham Kevin Hague Metiria Turei mining national national party Nick Smith oil Parliament Paula Bennett peak oil politics public transport rodney hide Russel Norman Sue Bradford Sue Kedgley transport waterArchives
Blogs
- A Bee of a Certain Age
- Auckland Trains
- Auckland Transport Blog
- Bibliophilia
- Bowalley Road
- Cactus Kate
- Capitalism bad, Tree pretty
- Dread Times
- envirohistory NZ
- Fare-Free New Zealand
- fearfactsexposed
- Fighting Talk
- Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog
- Frankly Speaking
- g.blog
- Gordon Campbell
- Grist
- Hot Topic
- Ideologically Impure
- Imperator Fish
- Janlogie's blog
- Just Left
- Kennedy Graham
- Kiwiblog
- Kiwipolitico
- KJT
- liberation
- Life and Politics
- Local Bodies
- MacDoctor
- Make Wealth History
- Mars 2 Earth
- Maui Street
- No Right Turn
- Open Parachute
- Public Address
- Pundit
- put 'em all on an island
- Reading the Maps
- Real Climate
- Red Alert
- Robert Guyton
- Socialist Aotearoa
- The Campaign for Better Transport
- The Dim Post
- The dullest blog in the world
- The Hand Mirror
- The Jackal
- The Oil Drum
- The Standard
- Thorndon Bubble
- Treehugger
- Truth Seeker
- Tumeke!
- well sharp
- Whale Oil
- Whoar.co.nz
- WorldChanging
- Worldwatch Institute
Green parties
Media
- Aotearoa Indymedia
- Audrey Young
- Colin Espiner
- Economist
- George Monbiot
- good
- Green World Press Review
- Guardian
- Harpers
- hugg
- NBR
- New York Review of Books
- New Zealand Listener
- NZ Herald
- NZFrog
- Reuters World Environment News
- Scoop
- Slate
- Spectator
- Stuff
- The Green Room
- The New Yorker
- The revolution will not be televised – a radio show
Paula Bennett Archive
-
More questions than answers over ACC cost shifting - by Kevin Hague
A couple of months ago, following ACC Minister Nick Smith’s u-turn on counselling for ACC sexual abuse claimants, I called for an independent review of the wide-ranging cutbacks to ACC imposed by the Government. I have now asked some questions about people being moved from ACC to welfare benefits. What really disturbed me about the replies is the huge increase in the number of people being shifted from weekly compensation onto welfare benefits since March 2009. read moreOctober 6, 2010 4:39 pm - 8 Comments -
More jobseekers + no more jobs = lower wages - by frog
New Zealand’s labour force grew by around 43,000 yesterday. That is the approximate number of single parents receiving domestic purposes benefit whose youngest child is aged six or over. As of yesterday, they all became part of the labour force; not necessarily because they all want to obtain paid employment but because Work and Income [...] read moreSeptember 28, 2010 1:31 pm - 76 Comments -
National’s Plan B: Strip-mine the poor - by frog
A printed copy of an email from Paula Bennett turned up at my lilypad very early this morning. Or was it just a nightmare? National’s Plan B – having failed in their objective to strip-mine the land: Strip-mine the poor. Bad for forcing down wage rates; bad for low-income employment churn, especially given the Fire at Will extension; bad for productivity; so ultimately bad for business too. Just plain dumb! read moreAugust 10, 2010 7:42 pm - 32 Comments -
Beneficiary-bashing Bill back in Parliament, and worse than ever - by Metiria Turei
Paula Bennett’s draconian Social Assistance (Future Focus) Bill has been reported back to Parliament by the Social Services Select Committee. Despite overwhelming opposition to the Bill by submitters, the National Party used its majority on the Select Committee to report it back largely unchanged. They even decided to recommend a harsher reduction of benefit regime for [...] read moreJuly 31, 2010 5:11 pm - 85 Comments -
Inside the welfare forum we were un-invited to - by Catherine Delahunty
Today and tomorrow, the Welfare Working Group is hosting a forum on welfare issues to look at the big picture. It was advertised as open to the first 250 people who enrolled, and billed as bringing together “a diversity of opinions and experience”. Metiria and I immediately registered, along with one of our researchers, because [...] read moreJune 9, 2010 5:02 pm - 174 Comments -
Due process for multinationals, not for beneficiaries - by frog
There is a sharp contrast between the Prime Ministerial responses to last week’s respective indiscretions by two of his more accident-prone Ministers. read moreJune 1, 2010 2:56 pm - 3 Comments -
Bennett’s unhelpful benefit cliches - by Catherine Delahunty
The Minister of Social Development Paula Bennett made a speech recently at the National Party Regional Conference in Oamaru, in which she talked about how terrible it is for children to see their parents on a long-term benefit. I must experience a more complex universe than the Minister. The worst experience for a child is [...] read moreMay 31, 2010 3:42 pm - 19 Comments -
An ACC model for welfare? No thanks - by frog
Over the weekend, Social Development Minister raised the prospect of an ACC model for sickness and invalid’s benefits. My bet is that Bennett is talking about moving sickness and invalid’s benefits to the insurance model that ACC is increasingly becoming based on, rather than to a model based on the Woodhouse principle of complete rehabilitation that it was founded on. read moreMay 31, 2010 10:35 am - 5 Comments -
Fuller v Bennett - by frog
While both I and Green MPs have slammed Paula Bennett’s beneficiary bashing policies, I haven’t climbed into the information privacy dispute between Bennett and DPB beneficiary Natasha Fuller – until now! Bennett is going too far, and seems to want to escalate the dispute for her own political ends. read moreMay 27, 2010 6:47 pm - 23 Comments -
A privatisation lesson from an unlikely source - by frog
Cameron (Whaleoil) Slater has been having a bleat about how he has been treated by the private insurer Fidelity Life, which has cut off his income protection insurance. Funny how those on the political right don’t seem to get it – until it affects them personally, that is. read moreMay 25, 2010 11:34 am - 37 Comments -
Human Rights Commission slams Future Focus - by frog
Remember the bad old days when Jenny Shipley was Minister of Social Welfare and there were beneficiary bashing measures in every Budget (including the benefit cuts in the 1991 Mother of All Budgets that have never been restored)? Surprised there is nothing similar in this year’s Budget? read moreMay 21, 2010 1:51 pm - 15 Comments -
Job creation and welfare policies are failing - by Catherine Delahunty
Most people spend less than a year on a benefit and use that time to rebuild their lives and education. The few who abuse the system pale into insignificance against losses from failed investment companies, tax evaders and corporate fraudsters. read moreMay 7, 2010 12:13 pm - 27 Comments -
Paula, Peter and Peter: a perplexing predicament - by frog
Today in the House, Catherine Delahunty posed a perplexing problem to Paula Bennett. Which Peter was she talking about? Last week, Catherine hit Paula up about the Welfare Working Group and the obvious bias of the people she had appointed. When asked about Peter Saunders’ statement that there is a link between “low average intelligence [...] read moreMay 5, 2010 5:56 pm - 34 Comments -
Send ’em all down pit, Paula - by frog
Let’s hope Gerry Brownlee and Paula Bennett don’t pick up on this policy initiative from Australian Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott. read moreApril 22, 2010 9:27 am - 8 Comments -
Welfare Working Group off to inauspicious start - by frog
Presumably under pressure from ACT, the Government seems to be unable to resist finding places for wingnuts on the various advisory groups it is setting up. Yesterday it continued this trend by appointing Business Roundtable communications consultant and former ACT Party President Catherine Isaac (formerly Judd) to its Welfare Working Group. read moreApril 15, 2010 1:22 pm - 20 Comments -
Freda Frog meets Future Focus - by frog
I have a cousin named Freda Frog. Freda is single, lives on her own, and suffers from a chronic illness, for which she gets a sickness benefit. Here’s a possible scenario she faces following Paula Bennett’s Future Focus welfare reforms: read moreMarch 29, 2010 1:28 pm - 21 Comments
