Emissions Trading Scheme Archive

  • frog

    A government at war with its own Treasury



    In all the time I’ve been hopping around Parliament I’ve never heard a statement more extraordinary than this one: The numbers from Treasury are nonsense. Treasury can’t tell us what the deficit is going to be in December let alone what’s happening in 2030 or 2040. Now, I’ll admit to having a go at Treasury forecasting myself [...] read more
    November 18, 2009 1:50 pm - 128 Comments
  • frog

    Burning the Mona Lisa to cook dinner



    Well known conservative commentator Thomas Friedman contends that destroying our biodiversity to fuel unregulated economic growth is like burning the Mona Lisa to cook dinner. The issue of how we should treat natural capital in our economy resurfaced today in a new economic think-tank report. read more
    November 3, 2009 3:49 pm - 11 Comments
  • frog

    George Orwell would be impressed with ETS minions



    In a classic case of doublethink, the minions at the Ministry for the Environment have withheld all the contents of an ETS cabinet document clearly labelled “Approved for Release”. read more
    October 13, 2009 3:59 pm - 66 Comments
  • frog

    One week left to submit on flawed ETS



    I’m using Nick Smith’s own words from last year because they are so suitable. This Government’s ETS legislation is so flawed and so rushed that it will require significant amendments after the election to make it workable. In the meantime, the rushed consultation period is coming to a close, hot on the heels of the urgency [...] read more
    October 7, 2009 10:05 am - 19 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    ETS is sure to spur growth – but what kind?



    Now here’s a great idea for economic development. Extract lignite, the lowest quality coal, very wet and of low calorific value. Add copious water pollution, coal seam methane and land disturbance from open cast mining. read more
    October 1, 2009 6:45 am - 20 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    Now we see the hidden costs of the ETS



    Last night’s briefing on the ETS finally revealed the two missing columns from the curious page of numbers tabled in the House on Tuesday by Nick Smith. That table, to the extent it was comprehensible at all, showed there would be a $415m cost to the taxpayer from now to 2013; a saving between 2013 and [...] read more
    September 24, 2009 10:32 am - 10 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    ETS makes us the seventh state



    It is clear from the minister’s briefing last night that the main purpose of National’s changes to the ETS is to make us effectively the seventh state of Australia. The bill mimics exactly the bill the Rudd government has been trying (unsuccessfully) to get through the Australian senate. So a bill that has been twice [...] read more
    September 24, 2009 9:17 am - 8 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    Wild and perverse ETS disincentives



    For the first six months of this year, wilding pine control cost DOC $811,000 in carbon liabilities – a large amount for a department that has already had its budget for this year cut by $13.5 million. That money could have saved some endangered species, increased the area of land under pest control, or – got rid of more wilding pines. read more
    September 22, 2009 1:27 pm - 39 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    Is Methanex poised to rort the taxpayer with National’s help?



    Methanex could get $87 million in free credits each year. Under the Labour scheme Methanex would have paid for their growth. Under National’s scheme, taxpayers do. read more
    September 20, 2009 10:09 am - 21 Comments
  • Jeanette Fitzsimons

    What’s wrong with the National-Maori Party ETS?



    Basically, it’s less obligation for everyone, and more delay. Taxpayers pick up the cost. It seriously weakens the scheme we have now, and will do little to reduce emissions. read more
    September 18, 2009 6:30 am - 41 Comments