2-0 down at halftime
In a moment of refreshing honesty, British Conservative Leader Michael Howard has admitted to being 2-0 down at halftime in the UK election campaign.
Reports the Guardian:
Two-nil down at half-time is every manager’s nightmare. Your key players are sulking and that tough-tackling foreigner you signed to boost your attack has only motivated your opponent’s fans into getting behind their side.
Michael Howard appeared to concede the Tories were losing the election match yesterday in an attempt to inspire a Tory comeback. But rather than change tactics, the Tory leader talked of politics following football.
“You often find… there is a team that might be two goals down at half-time, they win the game,” Mr Howard, a Liverpool supporter, told ITV news.
But only twice this season have Premiership clubs done this. So he was forced to cite Chelsea. “I went to the Carling Cup final a few weeks back to watch my team, Liverpool, play Chelsea. We were ahead until the last 10 minutes and then we were screwed,” he said. “So the election is not over until May 5 and I am confident we can win that.”
Astute political observers will well remember Bill English - facing 10-, 15-, even 20-point deficits in the polls in the 2002 election campaign - looking directly into the TV cameras and saying time and time again that National was hearing from people around the country that the polls were wrong, that the Nats were coming back and getting within striking distance of Labour. Expect similar nonsense this year from Brash.
The comeback didn’t happen in 2002. It won’t happen this year. The sooner everyone looks at the scoreboard, the better, so the real discussion of this election year can begin: which coalition partner do we want governing with Labour during its third term?








April 26th, 2005 at 1:03 pm
Ah, born to rule arrogance…
April 26th, 2005 at 1:17 pm
Nah, I don’t think any party is *born to rule*, just that National - despite its five years in opposition, has not yet convinced the public it’s ready again to govern. As a result, its chances of winning are so small that the only interesting question remaining about the composition of the next government is the identity of Labour’s coalition partner…
April 26th, 2005 at 1:53 pm
National have yet to admit that the policies of the 1990s were failures that no one want s to return to. As soon as it does that people will begin to treat them seriously again.
April 27th, 2005 at 4:29 am
Does anybody else remember the words “Bugger the pollsters” ?
Surprises can and sometimes do happen. That said Clark does have an amazing ability to distance herself from any problems that arise, she is easily NZs best politican.