The Prime Minister bragged about how much money his Government is spending on water clean-ups today, but he failed to admit that the money required for clean-up of our rivers and lakes will increase because of his policies.
Nearly every study on water quality shows that land use intensification leads to water pollution. Yet the Government removed the provision in the National Policy Statement on Freshwater that would have required a resource consent for land use intensification.
This means that a lot more land use intensification is going to happen with no check on its impacts, and our waterways will get worse.
The frustrating thing, is that eventually we will decide that we have intensified our land too much, that we have too many dairy cows and use too much water and fertiliser and that we need to cut back in order to have the clean rivers that New Zealanders want and deserve.
At that time, people who are converted their land to dairying will want to be bought out. And we won’t have enough money to pay them all out.
Right now, farmers are converting to dairying in areas in which we already have too much pollution. They are converting in areas such as the Mackenzie Basin which aren’t suited to dairying because of its low rainfall, high water quality and the native grasses and shrublands which will be destroyed to farm cows.
1000 cow dairy farms are being established in drought prone areas with light stony soils where large amounts of artificial fertiliser and water from our rivers have to applied to just grow grass. Right now people are allowed to choose a livelihood that later we will later say is unsustainable.
It is not all the farmers’ fault. It is the Government’s for not recognising that there are limits to how much pollution our soil and waterways can absorb. It is banks for being blinkered to the environmental and financial risks of such capital intensive farming and unsustainable debt levels it creates. New dairy farmers with massive debt seek to maximise milk production to service their debt, often at the environment’s expense.
It’s not okay.