Mourning local democracy in Canterbury

National’s distaste for democracy and intolerance of dissenting views is increasing. Pre ‘quakes Cathedral Square was the heart of Christchurch. Two years later the public are still fenced out and kept behind the cordon.

Further negotiations with a CERA staffer but the answer was still “NO” for the group to access the Square.

The Government’s Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) decides who can get access beyond the Army guards and security fence. CERA allows chaperoned Red Zone bus tours which include the Square and a portable pie cart.  It allows car parking but not free speech.

Yesterday CERA CEO Roger Sutton withdrew permission for myself and Green MP Mojo Mathers, Labour MP Ruth Dyson and 10 members of Canterbury’s OurWaterOurVote to visit a cairn of riverstones in the Square.

We had finalised the meeting point and time with CERA. We were liaising over the number of hard hats and high vis vests required when Mr Sutton rang to say the permission was withdrawn unless his Minister, Gerry Brownlee agreed.

Our access the Square was cancelled once CERA learnt that we wanted to lay a wreath on the cairn to commemorate the ineptly titled Environment Canterbury (Temporary Commissioners and Improved Water Management) Act 2012 becoming law this week. The Act removes Cantabrians’ right to vote and elect regional councillors to represent them for another three years.

The cairn is on public land in the Square owned by Christchurch City Council. But CERA’s sweeping powers means it can decide what happens in this most symbolic of public spaces. CERA allows and facilitates VIP and tourist bus tours to the Square but it disallows any criticism of Government policy which media may cover.

The Cairn – in the distance.

Thousands of people helped  build the cairn in 2010 after Government passed the original ECan Act which dismissed regional councillors and weakened water conservation orders as they apply to Canterbury rivers and lakes.

The cairn has survived more than11,500 earthquakes. It is potent and silent symbol of the power of the people and public unease about our loss of democracy and mismanagement of our rivers and aquifers.

 

 

7 thoughts on “Mourning local democracy in Canterbury

  1. So you wanted to hold up the rebuilding of Christchurch so you could carry out a crass and offensive political stunt – and you got turned down.

    You trivialize the deaths of real people who actually died right here, by laying fake wreaths.

    Do you have any idea of how offensive that is?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  2. Hi Eugenie. Did you hear any word from the Minister as to whether he’s had any knowledge/involvement of the incident and decision?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  3. Here’s an actual lawyer’s view on what happened, following Roger Sutton’s later statement that it was inappropriate for them to escort a political protest because CERA staff are public servants:

    Andrew Geddis: “All I’ll say is that this strikes me as being completely illegal. The fact CERA staff are public servants is a complete red herring. The Police are public servants, yet they often escort groups whose purpose is holding a political event. And to by diktat declare that “political events” are not a “reasonable purpose” for visiting central Christchurch is quite outrageous. I would love to see what, if any, NZBORA advice Roger Sutton has sought and received.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  4. This is stupid.

    In this country, you are allowed to protest, so get on and arrange your media circus.

    You dont have the right to protest anywhere and everywhere. There are people and organisations who will limit and control where you may protest.

    More importantly, as Photo notes, but perhaps more politly than a Canterbury dweller might put it, in Canterbury, where earthquakes killed a lot of people, mocking death (which is what laying wreaths as a policital statement is) is fucking disrespectful.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  5. I don’t know who thought this one through, but it’s difficult to imagine how it could have been made any more offensive.

    Would you put flowers at the entrance to the Pike River mine, not as a memory to the men who died, but as a symbolic reference to some local political process? What reaction do you think you’d get?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  6. Well done for scaring the bejesus out of big Gerry Eugenie. Another cut towards death by a thousand cuts. These daft decisions all add up.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>