by Russel Norman
The Australian Budget yesterday was remarkable for a number of reasons, not only for the fact that they’re one of the first Western countries to return their Government’s books to surplus.
The 2012 Australian Budget institutes a raft of new measures to raise revenues, especially revenues from activities that damage the environment. These new eco-taxes will help balance the Government’s books and shift their economy onto a more sustainable footing. Here’s how:
1. A carbon pricing mechanism
Receipts from the carbon pricing mechanism are expected to be A$24.7 billion to 2015/16. The revenue raised is being recycled used for tax cuts for those on lower incomes and a clean energy fund.
2. Resource Rent Taxes
These include a petroleum resource rent tax and a minerals resource rent tax expected to raise A$31.4 billion to 2015/16. These new eco-taxes recognise the one-off nature of resource extraction and will share the benefits a little more fairly across the country.
3. Cancellation of the company tax cut
The Aussie Government will save A$4.6 billion to 2015/16 by not proceeding with the company tax cut scheduled for the 2013/14 income year. The National Government here cut company tax rates here assuming Australia would follow suit as part of a race to the bottom that we can ever win, as IRD have recently argued (p36).
4. Cutting tax concessions for wealthy Australians
By cutting the tax concessions on superannuation contributions for individuals on income greater than A$300,000 the Australian Government will save A$1.4b to 2015/16 which they can recycle into new saving incentives for those on lower incomes.
Of course, the Budget wasn’t all good news. Education and unemployment benefits were ignored, along with a commitment to the cleantech manufacturing sector. But when you compare this Budget to ours, you start to see how poorly the National Government are managing our economy.
National’s programme of deep cuts to public services, poor quality spending on motorways, and collapsing tax revenues means they’re leaving us vulnerable to further economic shocks. And as for the actual economy, they’re not going to leave it any more resilient or sustainable from when they took office.
Russel
Published in Economy, Work, & Welfare | Environment & Resource Management | Parliament | THE ISSUES by Russel Norman on Thu, May 10th, 2012
Tags: australian budget, carbon tax, deficit, eco-tax, ecological tax reform, resource rent, surplus
More posts by Russel Norman | more about Russel Norman
on the trolls and those who are unable to keep on topic
Loading...
Developing CER to the next level, via tax harmonisation, is becoming increasingly plausible as a good thing for us.
Like or Dislike:
1 
1 (0)
Surely we can also learn the lessons from history. Austerity will only starve our domestic economy and infrastructure and reduce our economic resilience.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/austerity-measures-create-anorexic-weak.html
Like or Dislike:
2 
2 (0)
I personally favour the tax-the-undesirable paradigm and have advocated for it for a few decades now.
But regretably many Watermelons view/desire it as _another_ tax rather than as an _alternative_ tax.
A ‘eco-tax’ and a flat PAYE tax rate would be the best taxation system, but alas many Watermelons would have kittens at the prospect.
Like or Dislike:
1 
1 (0)
Perhaps a wee song will make Key see the error of his ways
http://vimeo.com/41963594
Like or Dislike:
1 
0 (+1)
If only we could get rid of GST, implement a 0.5% FTT and a simple, progressive taxation system based on wealth rather than income….ahhh but I can dream.
Like or Dislike:
3 
2 (+1)