6 thoughts on “The truth about the RMA

  1. What a lot of disingenuous bollocks.
    The dates don’t confirm your story merely confirm his.
    Don’t send out rubbish like this to time-poor people, at least get some intellectual integrity rather than obvious grandstanding

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  2. an average turn around of ten months? not bad. Especially considering what goes into approving a consent. It would have been nice to get some indication of what the actual complaint from Nick Smith was tho..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  3. Don’t forget the Poor – who barely cling to a dial-up connection – this flash pakeha broadband stuff just won’t do – besides if Dr Nick NightTan has anything relevant to say….why it’d be on the news wouldn’t it?
    Martins Smartin’ (must be rich)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  4. Nick Smith is just echoing the bleats from farmers who seem to have forgotten that National has promised them around $500 million in irrigation funding.

    Farmers want to continue to pay less tax than a couple of pensioners and have no accountability for their environmental destruction while receiving huge amounts of corporate welfare from taxpayers.

    Without a proper consenting process we’re going to get lots more buildings falling down and killing people in the next earthquake.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  5. I am sorry Russel I couldn’t read your letter as I am on dial up; I have tried both Google Chrome and Internet Explorer and it’s wasting time. It’s a pity because I live in Canterbury under the dictates of the Nick Smith/Ecan commisars.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>