Māori statutory board needs funding to work

There have been some predictable howls of outrage about the operational funding approved for the Māori Statutory Board set up under the ‘Super City’ legislation rammed through Parliament by Rodney Hide last year.

Apparently the Auckland Transition Agency estimated a budget of $400,000 for the Board’s operation, which has in fact been set at a little over $2 million for the balance of this financial year and $3.4 million for the 2011 – 2012 year.

I’m pleased to see the Council doing its best to ensure that this Board has the money and resources it will need to fulfil its mandate under the Act.  There have been too many instances of similar entities being starved of adequate funds, and then criticised for ’failing’ in their assigned roles.

The Greens shared the view of the Royal Commission on Auckland governance, and the overwhelming majority of submitters to the Select Committee, that Māori representation should be ensured by dedicated seats on the Council.  Rodney Hide threatened to resign as Local Government Minister if that happened, but sadly his bluff was not called.

The functions assigned to the Board by the legislation oblige it to identify and prioritise issues of significance to mana whenua and mataawaka (Māori who live in Auckland but are not mana whenua); to advice the Council on matters affecting Māori; and to work with Council on designing and implementing policies and processes to fulfil the Council’s responsibilities to mana whenua and matawaaka groups.

That’s a broad and deep role, and not one that could be achieved in any meaningful way on a shoestring.  People who are unhappy about the cost should talk to Rodney Hide and question his motives and actions in denying the preferred alternative of dedicated Māori seats, rather than criticising the Council for trying to get a good outcome despite the deeply flawed structure they have to work with.

5 Comments Posted

  1. @samiam 3:47 PM

    Yes, there are. But they are not representative of Maori, because they have been elected by a predominantly Tau Iwi (or if you don’t like the terminology, Tangata Tiriti) voter base.

    I get sick of this “Maori are a minority, so they must kiss the arses of the majority” approach.

    Maori are a minority because Pakeha deprived then of their economic base (and executed a few in the process of doing so). They are also a minority because Pakeha colonists introduced diseases to this country that they had no immunity to, and many Maori died as a consequence.

    Get over it, Samiam, and look to the historical facts and how they juxtapose with the current power relationships.

  2. Aren’t there 5 (part)Maori now holding seats in Auckland which they won fair and square in the open battlefield of general seats. Is that not representative?

  3. Elected maori are not ok with Rodney Hide, but undemocratically appointed ones are ok.

    Apparently he had wanted neither.

    Māori representation should be ensured by dedicated seats on the Council

    Satisfy my curiosity – how is Maori representation not racist? After all, it is representation based on race.

Comments are closed.