umm… so you are supporting a totalitarian exiled dictator who doesn’t believe in homosexual rights (though then again in NZ we don’t especially in the Cook Islands…refer male laws there…) so not supporting several members of our govt just in the way they conduct their lives…, Sexual expression within a normal Heterosexual Relationship or Abortion rights within a Sexist office (weren’t you attacking Her Majesty’s position recently for that) – these don’t sound like Kiwi Values either – of course he is not a Kiwi (the office never could be…). He has recently recently stated a referendum is required if they want him back…though also stating he thinks he is the last Dalai Lama despite the particular school of Buddhist thought following that there is no way he can possibly no that since the ability to reincarnate doesn’t lie with him or indeed any person – effectively saying that he wants his followers only to meditate under his guidance – sounds a bit cultist…

or, are you supporting the potentially Noble cause of allowing Tibet to become properly autonomous to the extent it has control over it’s domestic affairs resulting in said individual to return…unless what happened in Nepal spreads up there (like it did 60 odd years ago) , seems a little hypocritical to support the Nepalese Communist Revolution but not the Communist Autonomous territory of Tibet (the TAR)

Sorry if the post seems a bit attacky or Trolly (I’m not my other posts show I think ) and if it is I do apologise for that! but It’s just I find it so hypocritical of a member of the Green party to support policies that only found in parties such as Destiny or FFparty and I have to wonder how you can distinguish between the two Mr Keith Locke MP

I agree wholly with the idea that Tibet should share the same Autonomy that Macau and HK share of course but full independence could cripple the country (and China won’t be helping for sure)

That’s all again sorry if it seemed too assaulting but It’d be nice to hear your thoughts on those points..