NZ Green Party
Global concern at Nats’ plan to mine national parks

Scrutiny of Government plans to mine our conservation lands is deepening internationally. And it’s got people hot on Facebook too.

The Sunday Star Times ran a powerful feature on the weekend called “Picture imperfect”. It looks at international concern at New Zealand’s environmental performance, including National’s plan to mine conservation land:

IT’S JUST a stock-take of mineral resources, insists Gerry Brownlee, Minister of Energy and Resources. But the August announcement of a review of the schedule that prohibits mining and exploration in our national parks raised international hackles.

The 9th World Wilderness Conference (1500 delegates from 52 countries) in Mexico last month passed a resolution asking our government to retain the no-mining status quo measures of protection in relation to public conservation land within protected areas.

The government had already received a letter from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, after 200 delegates met in Korea: “The news that a modern, comparatively wealthy nation such as New Zealand is prepared to exploit its resources in lands set aside for biodiversity sends a disturbing message to more populous countries,” the IUCN said.

Today, the Greens received an e-newsletter from the Mountain Protected Areas that is being circulated around the world. It will be read by influencial policy makers world-wide.

The newsletter is from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s World Commission on Protected Areas, of which the New Zealand Government is a member. A section is critical of New Zealand’s change in position on mining protected areas:

Potential Problems In New Zealand PAs [Protected Areas]

From IUCN Regional Vice-Chair for Oceania, Penny Figgis comes some disturbing news about a threat from mining in NZ’s conservation estate. In a recent address to the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2009, the NZ Minister of Energy and Resources spoke on “Unlocking our Minerals Potential”. In it he stated: “In my short time as Minister, I have become acutely aware that one of the fundamental barriers to mineral exploration and development is access to prospective land, particularly to land administered by the Department of Conservation.”

Reasonable access to the mineral estate in Crown-owned land, particularly conservation land, is a key issue. Kiwi Bruce Jefferies has written expressing concern, and Nik Lopoukhine, WCPA Chair has written on behalf of the Commission. He has reminded the Prime Minister and the Ministers for Energy and Resources, and of Conservation, that NZ as an IUCN member, supported the resolution on mining passed at the 2000 World Conservation Congress in Amman, Jordan. It called for no mining in IUCN Categories I-IV. The mining industry itself in 2003 agreed not to exploit any World Heritage areas. It is hoped that the NZ Government will not permit this to move forward, especially in view of the PA leadership NZ has exhibited to date.

Last week, the Greens and the Federated Mountain Clubs broke the story that 20% of Mount Aspiring National Park was being touted for removal from Schedule 4 to make way for mining.

Since then the “Hands off Mt Aspiring” facebook page has gone ballistic, with 4325 members in a week. Join it now! I love this graphic:

Image from Julia Hamilton on the Facebook Page

Image from Julia Hamilton on the Facebook Page

10 thoughts on “Global concern at Nats’ plan to mine national parks

  1. Soiling our international reputation with this kind of cr*p, alongside of today’s news about factory farming of dairy cows in the McKenzie country -
    National, you greedy, grubby fools!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2 (+8)

  2. In news just released John key says don’t worry about Mt Aspiring
    there is only a 5% chance that it will be mined

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4 (+1)

  3. wekaontheroof, is this because the areas in question will be removed from Mt Aspiring National Park before they are mined?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0 (+4)

  4. I second greenfly.
    Greedy, gruby fools. Let’s hope someone at Copenhagen thoroughly humiliates Key & cohort. Like, say, the Danish Queen.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 (+2)

  5. Forget the 5% it should be absolutey zero with regards to National Parks!!!

    National Parks are sacred and should be held far above the ruling pigs who have their snouts in the trough.

    As I have mentioned on other posts, the Greens are going to be at odds with the National on a whole host of issues.

    There is a huge variance as to what Mr.Key said in his ‘green’ speeches prior to the election to what his government has actually done.

    NOW IS THE TIME TO GET RID OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1 (+1)

  6. How ironic.

    “greedy, gruby fools” and “ruling pigs” from the very people whom propose that the nation, and by extension the youth of this country, go even further in to debt to pay for their own little projects.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 (0)

  7. Quibbly Key also gave himself a 5% chance of going to Copenhagen

    Key was told that he was going to Copenhagen by Rudd and Gordo Brown. And so he went !

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1 (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>