Seeing the forest and the trees

RadioNZ reported this morning that forest plantings in NZ are at their lowest level since World War II. The report shows that just 1000 hectares of new forest was established during 2008 – down from 2400ha in 2007. New planting peaked at 100,000ha in 1992. Deforestation (not replanting forest after harvesting or converting forest to pasture) continued – 15,600ha was deforested in the year to March 08. Overall, the area of production forests in NZ fell by 17,100ha, down 1%.

Predictably, on the radio interview National blamed Labour and Labour blamed National.

Actually they’re both right – New Zealand’s rise in deforestation and slump in afforestation in recent years is a plague from both their houses. Labour failed to come up with a price on carbon until the dying days of their administration, and National – before and after the election – failed to give certaintly to the sector that forestry would earn credits and those credit would be worth something.

But it’s not just about quantity. The NatLabs have often agreed with Green ideas of diversifying our production forests beyond the Pinus radiata hegemony, and creating higher-value wood products rather than just the raw and methyl-bromide drenched logs that make up the bulk of our forestry exports. But they both singularly failed to do anything to change this situation. The latest stats show that “radiata pine is the dominant species, making up 89 percent of the planted forest area. Douglas fir is the next most common species, making up 6 percent”. And the slump in sales due to the recession is exacerbated because we have all our eggs in the raw log basket.

If we’d applied Greens’ policies on forestry and climate change years ago, deforestation would have long ceased and new plantings of quality trees would be well established. However, rather than just spouting “we told you so”, as the Greens’ forestry spokesperson I am promoting specific ideas and plans, and we hope the Government will take an interest. MAF’s forward-looking study signals we have to move in that direction anyway, but I think the sooner we do it the more our economy and environment will benefit. I am also exploring options for adding a forestry component to our Green New Deal we launched last week.

5 thoughts on “Seeing the forest and the trees

  1. Well as recycling kicks in – wood is a comparitively expensive option. If our population growth remains at (virtually) nil, domestic demand will flatline…..the fiscal crisis has brought about a re-assessment of self sufficiency in many countries.
    If the domestic Market were underwritten by Government, the Industry would prosper – no question.
    Can we? Should we? etc…..no question.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  2. I don’t see any need for the govt to underwrite the domestic wood market. What it needs to do is eliminate the uncertainty it has created over carbon pricing for the last 12 years, since we signed Kyoto.

    Even without a price on carbon, wood will be in demand for energy purposes around the world as we crack the cellulose to ethanol scale up….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  3. Believe me the country that produces the biggest Carrots Radishes is Punjab where i will be sweating this summer ..Radishes more than 4 feet in length.So naturalkly it could take two to carry a punbjabi potatoe home! They are worlds best irrigation experts who could change NZ into Holland!
    Now since the artificial prosp[erity has worked i have lot of unemployement here IT related professional youth graduates ,Accountants, Business Administrative, Sales and Marketting ,and ofcourse Skilled Labor .. Cmon NZ sacrifice some hours a n d there is a bit o f my personal interest ‘honest’ it it!
    After all Punjabese gave the worlds breakfast the Orange Juice break! I love what they are serving me from past twenty some says a churned butter drink lassi with a patty of butter floating on it…. Where did you say you want Rain?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  4. Attention to detail there forestry spokesperson. Firstly Methyl Bromide is a gas, so won’t be drenching anything – details matter, since this indicates to me that you could be throwing any other stats and asserttions out just as carelessly.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

  5. McTap: You are correct, but “methyl-bromide drenched logs” was clearly hyperbolic. Logs are fumigated with MB gas. But not all. Some go to markets or are in forms where fumigation is not required. Others are treated with phosphene. The point is that a lot of MB is used because we export mostly raw unprocessed logs. If we exported more higher-value wood products and used our wood more domestically, we would reduce the need for fumigation – and create jobs.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>