2 dimensional politics

by frog

I read a book once about a two dimensional world – as though the entire world were drawn out as lines on a flat piece of paper (from memory the book might have been this one).  The characters had to climb under or over each other to get past rather, than being able to walk around each other. All they could sense was what was in front or behind them. I get the impression that Helen Clark and some of her Labour colleagues view the world in a similar two dimensional way.  To the right of her is National and to the left are the Greens and the Maori Party. 

The concept that other political parties could be reaching out into a third dimension seems foreign –that tino rangatiratanga, sustainable green economics, or peace and democracy might sit outside her two dimensional left- right spectrum appears uncomprehended.

And thus perhaps it has not occurred to her that some of the smaller parties represent more than just off-shoots of either the left or the right, or that the public might be looking for something more than her two dimensional left-right analysis of politics. 

The televised debates are a good example of this.  Clark seems genuinely imperious to the concern that her dictum of no MMP parties means that not all views will be fairly represented in a political debate.  But it’s not just the televised debates.  I remain stunned that she seems to think the current Labour-New Zealand First-United Future coalition should be worthy of people’s support simply because it is not National, and in a two dimensional world there can be no other alternatives.

frog says

Published in Campaign | Justice & Democracy by frog on Wed, October 1st, 2008   

Tags: , , ,

More posts by frog | more about frog