Comments on: Russel and Spanky from RDU talk Tug-o-War http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/ hopping along the corridors of power Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:44:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: StephenR http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55559 StephenR Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:41:31 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55559 heh, wonder if that would be unethical... heh, wonder if that would be unethical…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: StephenR http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55557 StephenR Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:10:09 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55557 Would certainly be keen to know why the 'free marketers' are interested in the Green Party. Perhaps they are 'green', but just joined in order to try and change the party's direction a bit (or a lot)? Would certainly be keen to know why the ‘free marketers’ are interested in the Green Party. Perhaps they are ‘green’, but just joined in order to try and change the party’s direction a bit (or a lot)?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: BluePeter http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55426 BluePeter Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:28:24 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55426 >>our free marketers Snort. >>our free marketers

Snort.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: frog http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55424 frog Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:24:51 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55424 jh - If you want wider policy input, join the Green Party. No other party has as wide and encompassing policy process, which binds its caucus, rather than the other way around. We enjoy healthy, robust debate from our Marxists, our free marketers, our athiests, our religious and any other pair of opposites you want to throw at us. No other party embraces a wider diversity of views. To label us with only one label is just plain lazy. So what you are suggesting is that all submitters to a select committee are created equal, are equally correct and should not be questioned about their motives or their facts? Ridiculous in the extreme. jh – If you want wider policy input, join the Green Party. No other party has as wide and encompassing policy process, which binds its caucus, rather than the other way around. We enjoy healthy, robust debate from our Marxists, our free marketers, our athiests, our religious and any other pair of opposites you want to throw at us. No other party embraces a wider diversity of views. To label us with only one label is just plain lazy.

So what you are suggesting is that all submitters to a select committee are created equal, are equally correct and should not be questioned about their motives or their facts? Ridiculous in the extreme.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: jh http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55412 jh Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:20:40 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55412 Funny there was no banter on the name "Spanky". :wink: One more comment Linux: Policy needs a wide input. The problem with the smacking law is that the politicians went ahead guided my a self selected bunch of academics. In the submission process Sue Brdaford questioned Dr Millichamps motive for presenting contrary information.... the system needs a rethink Funny there was no banter on the name “Spanky”. :wink:

One more comment Linux: Policy needs a wide input. The problem with the smacking law is that the politicians went ahead guided my a self selected bunch of academics. In the submission process Sue Brdaford questioned Dr Millichamps motive for presenting contrary information…. the system needs a rethink

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: jh http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55410 jh Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:07:57 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/russel-and-spanky-from-rdu-talk-tug-o-war/#comment-55410 I think it would be very healthy for the environmental movement if the Green Party got 4.9% of the vote. The issues won't go away they will just be redefined and refocused. Greens you have nothing to loose but your Marxists. :mrgreen: I think it would be very healthy for the environmental movement if the Green Party got 4.9% of the vote. The issues won’t go away they will just be redefined and refocused.
Greens you have nothing to loose but your Marxists.
:mrgreen:

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]>