<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadians may beat us to the polls</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OutinFront</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55490</link>
		<dc:creator>OutinFront</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55490</guid>
		<description>Harper appears ready to disregard his own law for fixed terms of 4 years. Alongside the campaign funding rort earlier this year, ignoring the law seems to be a habit the Canadian conservatives have picked up from their brethren to the South in the US.  

Good news today is that Canada now has its first federal Green Party MP: Blair Wilson, a former federal Liberal Party MP from British Columbia.  

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/488157</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper appears ready to disregard his own law for fixed terms of 4 years. Alongside the campaign funding rort earlier this year, ignoring the law seems to be a habit the Canadian conservatives have picked up from their brethren to the South in the US.  </p>
<p>Good news today is that Canada now has its first federal Green Party MP: Blair Wilson, a former federal Liberal Party MP from British Columbia.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/488157" >http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/488157</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john-ston</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55474</link>
		<dc:creator>john-ston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55474</guid>
		<description>Hang on a second, doesn't the Canada Elections Act prohibit Stephen Harper from having an election prior to October 19, 2009 unless there is a vote of no confidence? Only thing that could trigger a vote of no confidence is if the BQ stop propping up the Conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on a second, doesn&#8217;t the Canada Elections Act prohibit Stephen Harper from having an election prior to October 19, 2009 unless there is a vote of no confidence? Only thing that could trigger a vote of no confidence is if the BQ stop propping up the Conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmess</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55469</link>
		<dc:creator>emmess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55469</guid>
		<description>Well, good on Stephen Haprper
I wish we had a party in power which would go to the polls when it can't govern effectively.
We should have had an election called in February for April</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good on Stephen Haprper<br />
I wish we had a party in power which would go to the polls when it can&#8217;t govern effectively.<br />
We should have had an election called in February for April</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55464</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/08/30/canadians-may-beat-us-to-the-polls/#comment-55464</guid>
		<description>I would read it differently. This says to me that the spending cap didn't work, you can find a good accountant to get you round anything. If they hadn't had a cap they wouldn't have needed to juggle funds, they could have run it all through the campaign account and declared the lot, thus being more transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would read it differently. This says to me that the spending cap didn&#8217;t work, you can find a good accountant to get you round anything. If they hadn&#8217;t had a cap they wouldn&#8217;t have needed to juggle funds, they could have run it all through the campaign account and declared the lot, thus being more transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
