<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil breaks another record on IEA statement and Iran</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bettertransport</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48654</link>
		<dc:creator>bettertransport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48654</guid>
		<description>Owen, I don't understand why you are talking about fossil fuels in general?  The issue is crude oil has reached $145 a barrel and the signals are it could go higher yet.  Trucks, aeroplanes and fishing boats are simple examples where there are no quick or easy substitutes for oil powered propulsion.  The "technology will save us" argument just won't work in time to save our oil dependent economy, which is already heading into recession.  We are being forced to fork out more and more money to oil exporting nations.  The only way out is to reduce our reliance on oil.  Agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen, I don&#8217;t understand why you are talking about fossil fuels in general?  The issue is crude oil has reached $145 a barrel and the signals are it could go higher yet.  Trucks, aeroplanes and fishing boats are simple examples where there are no quick or easy substitutes for oil powered propulsion.  The &#8220;technology will save us&#8221; argument just won&#8217;t work in time to save our oil dependent economy, which is already heading into recession.  We are being forced to fork out more and more money to oil exporting nations.  The only way out is to reduce our reliance on oil.  Agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen McShane</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48637</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen McShane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48637</guid>
		<description>Frog, the statistic you quote is correct.
BUt this simply reminds us of the problem of defining system boundaries.
The statistic refers to the percentage of "Consumer spending" which is direct spending by the consumer.

My first statistic was the percentage of fossil fuel burnt which of course includes power generation, shipping, aircraft and agriculture. 

The Australian study tried very hard to calculate the carbon footprint of the average household and included food, and transport and other goods and services.

The statistic you quote is useful if you want to demonise the motor car. But don't be surprised if, after driving all the cars off the road, there has been no meausurable  change in fossil fuel consumption.

On board storage can be supplemented by induction from cables under the road bed - the technology developed here in NZ by Prof John Boys of Auckland University. The cable can also be used as a guideline so that you can drive on to the motorway, engage the system and read a book while drawing power from the same cable which has turned a whole bundle of cars into a "train."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frog, the statistic you quote is correct.<br />
BUt this simply reminds us of the problem of defining system boundaries.<br />
The statistic refers to the percentage of &#8220;Consumer spending&#8221; which is direct spending by the consumer.</p>
<p>My first statistic was the percentage of fossil fuel burnt which of course includes power generation, shipping, aircraft and agriculture. </p>
<p>The Australian study tried very hard to calculate the carbon footprint of the average household and included food, and transport and other goods and services.</p>
<p>The statistic you quote is useful if you want to demonise the motor car. But don&#8217;t be surprised if, after driving all the cars off the road, there has been no meausurable  change in fossil fuel consumption.</p>
<p>On board storage can be supplemented by induction from cables under the road bed - the technology developed here in NZ by Prof John Boys of Auckland University. The cable can also be used as a guideline so that you can drive on to the motorway, engage the system and read a book while drawing power from the same cable which has turned a whole bundle of cars into a &#8220;train.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenR</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48635</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48635</guid>
		<description>You can be a bit smug, but hardly in the running for the title of resident troll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can be a bit smug, but hardly in the running for the title of resident troll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BluePeter</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48621</link>
		<dc:creator>BluePeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48621</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;Since BP is such a Blue Sky optimist, Iâ€™ll wait for him to pick me up in his Tesla, because obviously the Nats pay him well enough to afford one.

The Nats don't pay me anything. I've never voted National and I'm not a member. 

Born poor immigrant working class. Made my own money by, you know, working and investing. Yes, I can afford a Tesla if they, or their cousins, turn up. 

I'll gladly take you for a spin :)


&#62;&#62;As a guest on frogblog your views are welcome, but confrontational comments donâ€™t get us very far and â€œput downsâ€? are unnecessary!

Ironic. Apparently I'm the resident "troll" for speaking the truth as I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Since BP is such a Blue Sky optimist, Iâ€™ll wait for him to pick me up in his Tesla, because obviously the Nats pay him well enough to afford one.</p>
<p>The Nats don&#8217;t pay me anything. I&#8217;ve never voted National and I&#8217;m not a member. </p>
<p>Born poor immigrant working class. Made my own money by, you know, working and investing. Yes, I can afford a Tesla if they, or their cousins, turn up. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll gladly take you for a spin <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;As a guest on frogblog your views are welcome, but confrontational comments donâ€™t get us very far and â€œput downsâ€? are unnecessary!</p>
<p>Ironic. Apparently I&#8217;m the resident &#8220;troll&#8221; for speaking the truth as I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48619</link>
		<dc:creator>jh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48619</guid>
		<description>Soaring fuel prices prompt [Japanese] consumers to reconsider overseas travel

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/20080703TDY08307.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soaring fuel prices prompt [Japanese] consumers to reconsider overseas travel</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/20080703TDY08307.htm" >http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/20080703TDY08307.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benw</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48607</link>
		<dc:creator>benw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48607</guid>
		<description>BP is right, the technologies exist today to replace the motorcar in a design and engineering sense, i.e. we can build them.  But can we build enough of them, and quickly enough, to avoid massive social dislocation.  

For me, the time to ramp production of on-board storage is the key issue.  

For example, Toyota announced last month that it will ramp production of its batteries to 1M by 2010. 

http://tinyurl.com/6opcal

Sorry but that's not going to cut it, especially since rate of replacement of the fleet is going to need to climb beyond the usual.  So I think the market is going to do its thing and price these new cars out of the hands of the middle class and below in NZ.  

I'd like to hear from Alex, BP and Owen on solutions to that problem (production ramp up of storage).  Not because I think there are none, but because it would be a more interesting discussion :-)

In the meantime while we work that one out it would seem to be prudent to think about urban design and transport 'stop gaps' such as PT so we can avoid the gray slabs of Paris while also avoiding the continued sprawl of Auckland and our other big cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP is right, the technologies exist today to replace the motorcar in a design and engineering sense, i.e. we can build them.  But can we build enough of them, and quickly enough, to avoid massive social dislocation.  </p>
<p>For me, the time to ramp production of on-board storage is the key issue.  </p>
<p>For example, Toyota announced last month that it will ramp production of its batteries to 1M by 2010. </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6opcal" >http://tinyurl.com/6opcal</a></p>
<p>Sorry but that&#8217;s not going to cut it, especially since rate of replacement of the fleet is going to need to climb beyond the usual.  So I think the market is going to do its thing and price these new cars out of the hands of the middle class and below in NZ.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to hear from Alex, BP and Owen on solutions to that problem (production ramp up of storage).  Not because I think there are none, but because it would be a more interesting discussion <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In the meantime while we work that one out it would seem to be prudent to think about urban design and transport &#8217;stop gaps&#8217; such as PT so we can avoid the gray slabs of Paris while also avoiding the continued sprawl of Auckland and our other big cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frog</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48565</link>
		<dc:creator>frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48565</guid>
		<description>Owen - According to the Energy Data File released this week, 34% of all our observed consumer energy in 2007 was used for private transport. This does not include all the energy used for the Commercial Transport fleet.

If you just look at oil, the percentage of oil used by the private transport fleet in 2007 was 67%. Again, this excludes the oil that was used by commercial transport.

Agriculture used 4.3% of the oil in 2007.

So clearly it is the motorcar that has the oil consumption problem. I never said that the car would disappear, as BP and others have suggested, only that we need alternatives, fast. I never claimed that we would not need roads, either, as Owen likes to say.

Since BP is such a Blue Sky optimist, I'll wait for him to pick me up in his Tesla, because obviously the Nats pay him well enough to afford one.  ;-)   When the masses can afford it, I'll believe it. That day may come, but not until we go through a very painful withdrawal from our oil addiction, which BP and his mates are in complete denial of. In the meantime, I would like to see some public transport alternatives for our cities, so the average kiwi can commute. (again, not the rural strawman Owen, please)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen - According to the Energy Data File released this week, 34% of all our observed consumer energy in 2007 was used for private transport. This does not include all the energy used for the Commercial Transport fleet.</p>
<p>If you just look at oil, the percentage of oil used by the private transport fleet in 2007 was 67%. Again, this excludes the oil that was used by commercial transport.</p>
<p>Agriculture used 4.3% of the oil in 2007.</p>
<p>So clearly it is the motorcar that has the oil consumption problem. I never said that the car would disappear, as BP and others have suggested, only that we need alternatives, fast. I never claimed that we would not need roads, either, as Owen likes to say.</p>
<p>Since BP is such a Blue Sky optimist, I&#8217;ll wait for him to pick me up in his Tesla, because obviously the Nats pay him well enough to afford one.  <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   When the masses can afford it, I&#8217;ll believe it. That day may come, but not until we go through a very painful withdrawal from our oil addiction, which BP and his mates are in complete denial of. In the meantime, I would like to see some public transport alternatives for our cities, so the average kiwi can commute. (again, not the rural strawman Owen, please)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen McShane</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48559</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen McShane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48559</guid>
		<description>Why do you assume that high density buildings near the CBD use less energy and have a lower carbon footprint than low density low rise housing?
Read Consuming Australia and you will see that to their surprise the opposite is true. Mind you their conclusion was that household income is the key driver and that as rich people tend to live in the city centre their consumption is higher.

However Wendell Cox took up the base data and found that:
Lower GHG emissions are associated with 
â€¢	urban fringe locations, not the core.
â€¢	higher rates of detached housing.
â€¢	greater automobile use.
â€¢	lower population density.
Read the report at:
http://www.affordablehome.com.au/files/pdf/research-pdf/RDC_ACF_Greenhouse-Report.pdf

And uk-kiwi must be one of the very few who regards the Paris slabs with affection. They are the centre of just about all the social unrest in Paris.
Lighweight, adaptable houses with room for a garden and some expansion are the key. IF you force everyone into downtown all you do is increase congestion.

Roads are not the result of the invention of the motor car. They are incredibly useful - that's why the Romans built them and we still use them. All the main roads in Auckland city were built before the invention of the motorcar. All we have done since is add about 3% of the network as motorways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you assume that high density buildings near the CBD use less energy and have a lower carbon footprint than low density low rise housing?<br />
Read Consuming Australia and you will see that to their surprise the opposite is true. Mind you their conclusion was that household income is the key driver and that as rich people tend to live in the city centre their consumption is higher.</p>
<p>However Wendell Cox took up the base data and found that:<br />
Lower GHG emissions are associated with<br />
â€¢	urban fringe locations, not the core.<br />
â€¢	higher rates of detached housing.<br />
â€¢	greater automobile use.<br />
â€¢	lower population density.<br />
Read the report at:<br />
<a href="http://www.affordablehome.com.au/files/pdf/research-pdf/RDC_ACF_Greenhouse-Report.pdf" >http://www.affordablehome.com.au/files/pdf/research-pdf/RDC_ACF_Greenh ouse-Report.pdf</a></p>
<p>And uk-kiwi must be one of the very few who regards the Paris slabs with affection. They are the centre of just about all the social unrest in Paris.<br />
Lighweight, adaptable houses with room for a garden and some expansion are the key. IF you force everyone into downtown all you do is increase congestion.</p>
<p>Roads are not the result of the invention of the motor car. They are incredibly useful - that&#8217;s why the Romans built them and we still use them. All the main roads in Auckland city were built before the invention of the motorcar. All we have done since is add about 3% of the network as motorways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48558</link>
		<dc:creator>jh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48558</guid>
		<description>How did the Greens finish up with so many leftists? Looks like a very selective means of consensus. :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did the Greens finish up with so many leftists? Looks like a very selective means of consensus. <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eredwen</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48553</link>
		<dc:creator>eredwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/07/04/oil-breaks-another-record-on-iea-statement-and-iran/#comment-48553</guid>
		<description>woops! that was an art worth "LEARNING" not leaning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woops! that was an art worth &#8220;LEARNING&#8221; not leaning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
