Woman’s Weekly goes green

Yay for the NZ Woman’s Weekly and its first ever green issue.  This week, has it got ‘57 pages of stories aimed to both inform you and inspire you to think green’.

‘Outrageous Fortune star Robyn Malcolm tells eco-warrior Francesca Price about why she’s getting back to basics and learning that less is really more.’

And the cover story, 20/20 host Miriama Kamo talks about her slice of heaven on Waiheke Island and ‘reveals her eco-friendly goals and the small steps that changed her life.’

And, of course, what green gossip mag would be complete without a photo shoot of Jeanette’s eco haven? (She’s even bumped the story about Prince William and Kate Middleton of the cover):

Seeing Jeanette Fitzsimons in her organic garden nestled in the Kauaeranga Valley in the Coromandel it’s difficult to imagine this woman striding the corridors of the Beehive, fighting the save the planet.

Indeed.

But once she’s got that superhero cape on these no stopping her striding up and down those corridors. Stride, stride, stride.

When we built the house it was going to cost us $20,000 to be connected to the national grid, so instead we used that money to invest in solar and wind power… We have a micro-hydro unit which uses water from the stream.  It isn’t enough in the summer, but in the winter, when there is less sun, and we need to supplement our solar power, there is plenty of energy.

It’s funny how green solutions are far more pleasant than people sometimes first imagine they are.

Woman's Weekly 24 June

frog says

17 Responses to “Woman’s Weekly goes green”

  1. big bro Says:

    No wonder their circulation is so low.

  2. frog Says:

    Apparently not that low. The editorial on its website says:

    Nearly 900,000 people read this magazine each week, and if every one of you makes one of the small changes suggested in this issue - ban plastic bags, switch the telly off at the wall, plant some veges, catch a bus or swap a few lightbulbs - together, as this massive Weekly community, we can actually affect the future.

  3. barking rabbit Says:

    big bro … why do you spend so much time on this site when the views expressed by ‘frog’ are obviously so opposed to your own. Do you enjoy exercising your sarcasm muscle? Would you not rather be part of a web community that shares your views? Do you honestly think you are doing this commuity a favour with your devil’s advocate stance? Informed debate is enriching - but you just seem to have a bow and a quiver full of grumpy-tipped arrows. Am genuinely interested in hearing what you get out of these activities ….

  4. BluePeter Says:

    I do like the idea of energy self-sufficiency, especially when my Contact bill arrives. Ouch.

    The problem is the tech isn’t quite there yet (too expensive, too little output), but as soon as it is, I’ll in.

  5. eredwen Says:

    Good stuff and an excellent target market!

    Don’t underestimate the “women who have time to read the Woman’s Weekly” on a regular basis, and don’t underestimate the “reach” of any good information contained within. The article will be discussed in the children’s playground, at the school gates, etc etc

    Front page coverage is a real bonus. That is on display at the corner dairy, the local bookshop, etc which extends well beyond the WW’s regular readership.

  6. eredwen Says:

    How big is your Contact Energy bill Blue Peter?

    Our Meridian monthly bill averages out in the low $50’s (the highest on record is $62, and we have yet to install solar water heating).

    Maybe there are some things that you could learn from the Greens …

  7. BluePeter Says:

    >>How big is your Contact Energy bill Blue Peter

    The one that arrived today was $600. But then I have a big, 1930’s house, spa pool, central heating, and an aversion to cold.

    The next house we have, we intend to build, and we’ll be including every applicable insulation and “green” technology going. Hopefully, power alternative power generation is up to speed by then.

    >>Maybe there are some things that you could learn from the Greens

    Yep. That’s part of the reason I’m here ;)

  8. big bro Says:

    I guess we can add Miriama to the long list of biased left wing media types.

    Just why does the government own a radio network and TV organisation anyway?

  9. samiam Says:

    I think they should bring out a monthly magazine. Woops, bad joke.

  10. BluePeter Says:

    >>Woops, bad joke.

    Just got that. LOL.

  11. greenfly Says:

    The WW ‘Green Edition’ is an awesome format for green issues and the effects will ripple in increasingly large waves up to and beyond the election. I couldn’t be happier with this priceless showcasing - real people, doing great green things. Sido Kitchin - thank you!

  12. StephenR Says:

    WW reporting on something…constructive? Well blow me down. Rather unfortunate that 900,000 a week read it in the first place, but in this case - ‘hurrah’!

  13. itstheeconomystupid Says:

    yes ladies, consume your way to a green revolution!

    I do get very sick of a constant message that we can save the planet by buying more green stuff. Part of the reason we are in this conundrum in the first place is because we consume way too much stuff.

    I’d love to see one of these lifestyle magazines moot the idea of buying less, heaven forbid, buy nothing!

    Buy it yourself, make it yourself. Much more interesting.

  14. SleepyTreehugger Says:

    itstheeconomystupid,

    So how precisely are people going to pay for the costs of living if they lose their jobs, because everyone decides to make things themselves?

  15. SleepyTreehugger Says:

    I meant …everything themselves?

  16. kahikatea Says:

    # SleepyTreehugger Says:
    June 25th, 2008 at 7:39 pm

    > So how precisely are people going to pay for the costs of living if they lose their jobs, because everyone decides to make things themselves?

    People won’t make everything themselves. If we could do that, the economy would never have been invented. But the more things people make for themselves, the less money they need to buy stuff, so the less paid work they need to pay for it. It is a weird thing about GDP that if you grow your own apples they’re not considered to be worth anything, but if you work at KFC and spend money from that job on buying apples, you’re considered to be better off, even if they’re inferior apples (not that anyone spends their entire income on apples - it’s a simplification).

  17. Ari Says:

    StephenR- I had a similar reaction. While I trust women themselves to do something constructive, (it happens a lot) the actual media aimed at them is a lot less reliable. Yay for W’sW taking on more serious issues than some rich celebrity’s new girl/boyfriend! :)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.