Jumbo’s retirement

by frog

Many conservationists feel there is something viscerally wrong with animal circuses.  Why do they call all their elephants ‘Jumbo’ for instance?  On the other hand people also allege that parliament is like a circus – with question time akin to a public viewing of feeding time.  There are certainly the occasional politicians a bit like old Jumbo here who has been performing in such an institutionalized manner that she’s not sure what to do any more out in the rest of the world.

So, it is nice to see that Jumbo has found a new home to go to even if it is another zoo to replace her recently closed down one.  It’s an alternative parliament to perform in -  a sort of House of Lords for elephants.  Animal welfare is a funny sort of thing.  As the Sunday Star Times notes:

Which left Ratcliffe [Jumbo's owner] with a dilemma. As his longtime critic, SPCA chief executive Robyn Kippenberger, put it: “There isn’t an old people’s home for elephants in New Zealand, and you can’t just let them off down the Southern Motorway.” (The organisation, which opposes animals working in circuses, says Ratcliffe now owes Jumbo a comfortable retirement.) Jumbo was a serious undertaking; she eats five bales of hay and at least $100 of vegetables a day.

Jumbo’s apparent yearnings to remain in the circus rather than slip into comfortable retirement somehow make an easier animal welfare discussion point for us lay critics than the millions of broiler chickens whose [admittedly beady] eyes we never need look into.

frog says

Published in Environment & Resource Management | Society & Culture by frog on Sun, May 11th, 2008   

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

More posts by frog | more about frog