<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spotless and PSIS not giving employers a good name</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/04/03/spotless-and-psis-not-giving-employers-a-good-name/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SleepyTreehugger</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/04/03/spotless-and-psis-not-giving-employers-a-good-name/#comment-40464</link>
		<dc:creator>SleepyTreehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/04/03/spotless-and-psis-not-giving-employers-a-good-name/#comment-40464</guid>
		<description>"Then we have little PSIS.  At the moment PSIS workers are paid significantly less than workers in doing the same or similar jobs in big foreign-owned banks."

PSIS is not a bank, its a credit union, and thus isn't accorded the same priviliges that trading banks are, which is why it can't afford to pay the same rate that the foreign owned banks do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then we have little PSIS.  At the moment PSIS workers are paid significantly less than workers in doing the same or similar jobs in big foreign-owned banks.&#8221;</p>
<p>PSIS is not a bank, its a credit union, and thus isn&#8217;t accorded the same priviliges that trading banks are, which is why it can&#8217;t afford to pay the same rate that the foreign owned banks do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
