<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid Energy trumpets its environmental performance</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: McTap</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40031</link>
		<dc:creator>McTap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40031</guid>
		<description>Using solar energy plants use hydrogen from water and carbon from carbon dioxide to make carbohydrate, oxygen is a by-product of this. At night when plants respire they also release carbon dioxide. CO2 is no good without water and sunlight, its an ingredient for food production, not food in itself. A bit like oil as an essential ingredient in commercial food production, but we can't ingest it directly.

Reduce the amount of plants through deforestation and converting the land to pasture, and increase the variability of the water supply and it becomes even more difficult for plants to sequester it.

The fossil fuels that we use today were stored in sediments millions of years ago, and as they have been stored the earth's temperature has gradually decreased. We exist in such robust numbers now because the current climatic conditions are just right to support us, change these conditions and fail to switch from oil dependance....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using solar energy plants use hydrogen from water and carbon from carbon dioxide to make carbohydrate, oxygen is a by-product of this. At night when plants respire they also release carbon dioxide. CO2 is no good without water and sunlight, its an ingredient for food production, not food in itself. A bit like oil as an essential ingredient in commercial food production, but we can&#8217;t ingest it directly.</p>
<p>Reduce the amount of plants through deforestation and converting the land to pasture, and increase the variability of the water supply and it becomes even more difficult for plants to sequester it.</p>
<p>The fossil fuels that we use today were stored in sediments millions of years ago, and as they have been stored the earth&#8217;s temperature has gradually decreased. We exist in such robust numbers now because the current climatic conditions are just right to support us, change these conditions and fail to switch from oil dependance&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougT</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40014</link>
		<dc:creator>DougT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40014</guid>
		<description>Take a look at http://www.nzclimatescience.org/ and do the global warming test in the top RH corner of the web page.
Take a look at it GW Denier and ask yourself why they use loaded questions and even make claims that conflict with the evidence they use?

In 2004 David Bellamy said that glaciers were advancing rather than retreating, and claimed the evidence was in an article that never even existed, so he voluntarily withdrew from the global warming debate.  It's funny how he popped up on the other side of the planet and rejoined the debate here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.nzclimatescience.org/" >http://www.nzclimatescience.org/</a> and do the global warming test in the top RH corner of the web page.<br />
Take a look at it GW Denier and ask yourself why they use loaded questions and even make claims that conflict with the evidence they use?</p>
<p>In 2004 David Bellamy said that glaciers were advancing rather than retreating, and claimed the evidence was in an article that never even existed, so he voluntarily withdrew from the global warming debate.  It&#8217;s funny how he popped up on the other side of the planet and rejoined the debate here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenR</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40013</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40013</guid>
		<description>Well it's a food for plants, innit. It's just that plants can only absorb so much and grow so fast. Increasing temperatures and more droughts lower plant uptake of CO2 as plants breathe in less to conserve water. Same with the oceans, they've juuust about stopped absorbing CO2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s a food for plants, innit. It&#8217;s just that plants can only absorb so much and grow so fast. Increasing temperatures and more droughts lower plant uptake of CO2 as plants breathe in less to conserve water. Same with the oceans, they&#8217;ve juuust about stopped absorbing CO2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McTap</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40010</link>
		<dc:creator>McTap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-40010</guid>
		<description>GW Denier - lets see you eat it! 

It is actually a waste product of metabolism,

Hold your breath and let it build up in your body, this will cause your blood acidity to rise - much like what is happening in the ocean, doesn't feel so good aye!

I'm probably wasting my time, the fact that you're calling yourself GW Denier should alert me to your profound ignorance - go do a bit of research and come back when you have something substansial to write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GW Denier - lets see you eat it! </p>
<p>It is actually a waste product of metabolism,</p>
<p>Hold your breath and let it build up in your body, this will cause your blood acidity to rise - much like what is happening in the ocean, doesn&#8217;t feel so good aye!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably wasting my time, the fact that you&#8217;re calling yourself GW Denier should alert me to your profound ignorance - go do a bit of research and come back when you have something substansial to write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW Denier</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-39988</link>
		<dc:creator>GW Denier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-39988</guid>
		<description>CO2 is a food, lets burn more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CO2 is a food, lets burn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treesoftomorrow</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-39986</link>
		<dc:creator>treesoftomorrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/03/27/solid-energy-trumpets-its-environmental-performance/#comment-39986</guid>
		<description>no wonder solid energy isn't making a profit, if it is busy making snail PR films and spending money on spies. wonder what their Thompson and Clark bill was?

$50,000 on a snail propaganda piece.
Wonder if Don Elder is the main hero.. and who the villains are...?

Well they do have the climate skeptic David Bellamy as one of the PR celebrities for Waikato mine sites. Solid Energy the cleanest coal merchants in New Zealand... yeah right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no wonder solid energy isn&#8217;t making a profit, if it is busy making snail PR films and spending money on spies. wonder what their Thompson and Clark bill was?</p>
<p>$50,000 on a snail propaganda piece.<br />
Wonder if Don Elder is the main hero.. and who the villains are&#8230;?</p>
<p>Well they do have the climate skeptic David Bellamy as one of the PR celebrities for Waikato mine sites. Solid Energy the cleanest coal merchants in New Zealand&#8230; yeah right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
