<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the main course coming back to life?</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevor29</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31759</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31759</guid>
		<description>So let me get this right...

BB says that draconian taxes will prevent any benefit from more wind and marine power sources strengthening our economy. Given that most of our electricity generation is by various State-Owned Enterprises, why would the government apply draconian taxes to itself?

As BB has pointed out, we are a long way from our trading partners, so any reduction in imported fuels has an extra double benefit from savings in transporting both the imported fuels and the exports to pay for them.

Trevor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this right&#8230;</p>
<p>BB says that draconian taxes will prevent any benefit from more wind and marine power sources strengthening our economy. Given that most of our electricity generation is by various State-Owned Enterprises, why would the government apply draconian taxes to itself?</p>
<p>As BB has pointed out, we are a long way from our trading partners, so any reduction in imported fuels has an extra double benefit from savings in transporting both the imported fuels and the exports to pay for them.</p>
<p>Trevor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31758</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31758</guid>
		<description>Stuey says,

"the greens do not have a policy to raise taxes, our polices are revenue neutral, so that rises in pollution taxes are offset by reductions in personal taxes.

toad says

"Mind you, might be lookling to change that!"

flippy floppy ??

Stuey's version would see the massive surplusses returned to the masses while toads wants to raise taxes while maintaining the massive surplusses?

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

toad says,

"There’s no point in giving upper income people one. Ther are already doing rather well, and have the capacity to avoid tax through tax-loss making property investment anyway."

Highr income earners structure their property investments as a loss making business from which they claim tax write off against their more profitable businesses  The do not need a LAQC.  Only the middle class wage and salary earners have LAQC's to offset their losses against wages and salaries.

Would need a massive strutural change in tax law to get at the upper income people.

Get up to speed toad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuey says,</p>
<p>&#8220;the greens do not have a policy to raise taxes, our polices are revenue neutral, so that rises in pollution taxes are offset by reductions in personal taxes.</p>
<p>toad says</p>
<p>&#8220;Mind you, might be lookling to change that!&#8221;</p>
<p>flippy floppy ??</p>
<p>Stuey&#8217;s version would see the massive surplusses returned to the masses while toads wants to raise taxes while maintaining the massive surplusses?</p>
<p>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.</p>
<p>toad says,</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s no point in giving upper income people one. Ther are already doing rather well, and have the capacity to avoid tax through tax-loss making property investment anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>Highr income earners structure their property investments as a loss making business from which they claim tax write off against their more profitable businesses  The do not need a LAQC.  Only the middle class wage and salary earners have LAQC&#8217;s to offset their losses against wages and salaries.</p>
<p>Would need a massive strutural change in tax law to get at the upper income people.</p>
<p>Get up to speed toad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toad</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31757</link>
		<dc:creator>toad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 06:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31757</guid>
		<description>Um, no BB!!  

Give &lt;b&gt;lower&lt;/b&gt; and middle income people a tax cut.  There's no point in giving upper income people one.  Ther are already doing rather well, and have the capacity to avoid tax through tax-loss making property investment anyway.

Mind you, might be lookling to change that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, no BB!!  </p>
<p>Give <b>lower</b> and middle income people a tax cut.  There&#8217;s no point in giving upper income people one.  Ther are already doing rather well, and have the capacity to avoid tax through tax-loss making property investment anyway.</p>
<p>Mind you, might be lookling to change that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bro</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31754</link>
		<dc:creator>big bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31754</guid>
		<description>Stuey I did reply but once again frogblog is not allowing free speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuey I did reply but once again frogblog is not allowing free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bro</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31753</link>
		<dc:creator>big bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31753</guid>
		<description>Stuey

I simply do not believe that the Green party will not raise taxes, all the evidence suggests that they will, the background of most of the MP's would suggest they will and the hard left socialist agenda of the party suggests they will.
When you have this much evidence it is difficult to believe that they Greens will not raise taxes, you should understand this better than most as this is the same logic the Greens use to push the Global warming con.

When I hear either of the co-leaders (BTW, why is one of your leaders doing all the talking lately while other remains silent?) come out and say that they will give middle and upper income people a tax cut to compensate for these new punitive and economy wrecking taxes I will believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuey</p>
<p>I simply do not believe that the Green party will not raise taxes, all the evidence suggests that they will, the background of most of the MP&#8217;s would suggest they will and the hard left socialist agenda of the party suggests they will.<br />
When you have this much evidence it is difficult to believe that they Greens will not raise taxes, you should understand this better than most as this is the same logic the Greens use to push the Global warming con.</p>
<p>When I hear either of the co-leaders (BTW, why is one of your leaders doing all the talking lately while other remains silent?) come out and say that they will give middle and upper income people a tax cut to compensate for these new punitive and economy wrecking taxes I will believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor29</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31750</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31750</guid>
		<description>So BB, which proposed tax would apply to the benefits of installing better insulation or solar water heating? A capital-gains tax perhaps, but wouldn't they be capital investments and therefore deductable?

And not so much of the "old" if you don't mind :)

Trevor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So BB, which proposed tax would apply to the benefits of installing better insulation or solar water heating? A capital-gains tax perhaps, but wouldn&#8217;t they be capital investments and therefore deductable?</p>
<p>And not so much of the &#8220;old&#8221; if you don&#8217;t mind <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Trevor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuey</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31748</link>
		<dc:creator>stuey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31748</guid>
		<description>I see BB is off on his broken record speech again. blah blah blah you are so boring.

as has been pointed out to you so many times it is not funny, the greens do not have a policy to raise taxes, our polices are revenue neutral, so that rises in pollution taxes are offset by reductions in personal taxes.

I can only assume that either you are totally and utterly forgetful, or you like to willfully misrepresent the Greens policy in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see BB is off on his broken record speech again. blah blah blah you are so boring.</p>
<p>as has been pointed out to you so many times it is not funny, the greens do not have a policy to raise taxes, our polices are revenue neutral, so that rises in pollution taxes are offset by reductions in personal taxes.</p>
<p>I can only assume that either you are totally and utterly forgetful, or you like to willfully misrepresent the Greens policy in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31747</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31747</guid>
		<description>bb, Chap by the name of Einstein claims that e=mc squared. If he's right then so is Trevor and those benefits WILL happen. But this Einstein chappy is one of them academic theory wallahs so he's probably completely out of touch with the real world. Any free market economist can prove that e can't possibly equal mc squared because e is infinite. Otherwise there would have to limits to GDP growth, and that simply aint so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb, Chap by the name of Einstein claims that e=mc squared. If he&#8217;s right then so is Trevor and those benefits WILL happen. But this Einstein chappy is one of them academic theory wallahs so he&#8217;s probably completely out of touch with the real world. Any free market economist can prove that e can&#8217;t possibly equal mc squared because e is infinite. Otherwise there would have to limits to GDP growth, and that simply aint so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bro</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31746</link>
		<dc:creator>big bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31746</guid>
		<description>Trevor

Sorry old chap but that is absolute rubbish, any benefits that MAY come from what you suggest will be totally wiped out by the punitive and draconian taxes Labour and the Greens are going to impose on us.

Our economy is export driven, we are further away from the world markets than anybody else and can LEAST afford these feel good taxes, never forget we produce 0.2 of the world emissions yet we are being conned into believing our efforts will make a difference.

They will make a difference all right, the economy will crumble the state will become all powerful as more and more kiwi's depend on the govt for their income and the communists and socialists will finally have what they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor</p>
<p>Sorry old chap but that is absolute rubbish, any benefits that MAY come from what you suggest will be totally wiped out by the punitive and draconian taxes Labour and the Greens are going to impose on us.</p>
<p>Our economy is export driven, we are further away from the world markets than anybody else and can LEAST afford these feel good taxes, never forget we produce 0.2 of the world emissions yet we are being conned into believing our efforts will make a difference.</p>
<p>They will make a difference all right, the economy will crumble the state will become all powerful as more and more kiwi&#8217;s depend on the govt for their income and the communists and socialists will finally have what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor29</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31745</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/09/23/is-the-main-course-coming-back-to-life/#comment-31745</guid>
		<description>Many of the ideas for reducing AGW gases would strengthen our economy rather than weaken it. These include encouraging solar water heating, improved insulation, more wind and marine power generation, encouragement of electric or hybrid vehicles, etc.

The cost of importing energy will rise. Any steps that we take that reduce our dependence on importing energy will strengthen the economy.

Trevor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the ideas for reducing AGW gases would strengthen our economy rather than weaken it. These include encouraging solar water heating, improved insulation, more wind and marine power generation, encouragement of electric or hybrid vehicles, etc.</p>
<p>The cost of importing energy will rise. Any steps that we take that reduce our dependence on importing energy will strengthen the economy.</p>
<p>Trevor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
