Comments on: Stabilising the housing market

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:55:22 +0000

with that CAP GAINS thing dudes,
them family NAT people wouldn’t have to pay CAP GAINS
above their present value for second house as at introduction of legislation almost immediately after next election.
but after the date of next election we have CAP GAINS TAX on second house, guarantee dudes, I see to it myself,
also younger rental people would from then on be in an equitable market,
now I teld yous 5% Green easy with proper environmental objectives

By: jh

jh — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:30:50 +0000

I wonder if we could have a system of compulsory notification of house sales, prior to listing by a real estate agent… we can do it easily with the internet.. This would limit the situation where agents find sucker> low price> quick sale.
???
jh

By: Sapient

Sapient — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 01:08:03 +0000

i was just being a smart arse, i do agree with you though. we must shop around, or atleast make it look like we are shoping around, if labour finds itself in danger of loosing whatever percentage we get they are more likley to try to accomodate us, if it comes to a bidding war between Nats and Labour on who get the greens vote then we are more likley to get closer to what we want. if we can pass the threshold that is, and get enough to be needed.

Sapient

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:41:25 +0000

pivotal,
a point around which anything turns, changes,
as soon as Rod Donald declared Green as being an absolute political ally of helengrand,
you lost any leverage,
it is true you can pivot fom anywhere,
but as Peters proves every electioon, and john key is learning,
its best to be at the balance point,
as soon as you align with helengrand,
you can not weild any power or leverage,
and your pivotal pint becomes the extreme left,
and for that you need about 30% votes,

require jeanette and russell to enter discussions with NAT, now
it would be a buzz talk thing for ages,
what were they talking about and why,
this way you can not be dismissed as irrelevant,
helengrand will give you Ministerials if she win,
and NAT have to give you policy [ say CAP GAINS ]
as arranged or you withdraw support,
pivot around issues with which ordinary kiwis can identify,
not social issues it won’t work,
also dudes remember that Peter’s Done,
only other pivot is Winston,

By: Kevyn

Kevyn — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:22:19 +0000

depends on who pq was referring to as pivotal and in what context. I though he was talking to bj in relation to immigration (forced by climate change?)

By: Sapient

Sapient — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:53:37 +0000

a pivot does not require a central position, it can be at any position, the pivot is mearly the point around which the object rotates, although the closer the piviot is to one point the more force must be exerted upon that point to move the other point Touque= Force *Distance.
simple physics realy

it would be interesting to see you go up against winston, hes smarter than he seems.

Sapient

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:05:58 +0000

move now

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:02:54 +0000

if yous want me to i can move into taraunga get green things done,
peters winston must gain electorate or die,
done
change things fast

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:42:02 +0000

to all discerning readers,
one can not be the pivot of the left,
pivot power requires central position,

By: peterquixote

peterquixote — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:41:36 +0000

you will get a fair

capital gains tax = equity