I was interested to read that Richard John Seddon was a___?(lay lawyer)… Not a bad idea. In some ways when lawyers get involved another crime is committed____(over charging) .
jh

There are things that can be said that would be contempt. People should be careful so that they don’t prejudice Bain’s right to a fair trial.

“any opinions on evidence, or guilt or not, are clear contempt of court..”

The law is rarely as clear cut a Phil suggests.

[The Solicitor-General] warned journalists to be careful in the way they now covered the case.

After Bain was released on bail, there had been public discussion of the merits of the Crown and defence cases, he said.

This was no longer appropriate now the decision to continue with the prosecution had been made, he said.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10447090

..that since the retrial has been called..

any opinions on evidence..or guilt or not..

are clear contempt of court..

(i would advise frog to delete b.b.’s comments..)

and for b.b/troll to shut the feck up..)

phil(whoar.co.nz)

Is it really that hard for you to understand why so many people feel that Bain is guilty?

I have not read or heard anything that would make me change my mind, most of the theories put forward by Karem and the Bainiacs fall just short of accusing little green men of killing the Bain family.

He has been found guilty twice and I see no reason why he will not be found guilty a third time.

hark, whats that sound I hear? is it the little clippity-clop of some billy goats?