<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanity Fair</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26406</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26406</guid>
		<description>Boy what a lightweight. And he is the best the climate change denialists can do. I love the way he's saying at the same time, Climate change isn't happening, and yes it's happening but global warming is good!

Hilariously enough, even Exxon Mobil has stopped funding this bunch of clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy what a lightweight. And he is the best the climate change denialists can do. I love the way he&#8217;s saying at the same time, Climate change isn&#8217;t happening, and yes it&#8217;s happening but global warming is good!</p>
<p>Hilariously enough, even Exxon Mobil has stopped funding this bunch of clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pingpong</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26350</link>
		<dc:creator>pingpong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26350</guid>
		<description>http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/skeptic200705

Well, this is a pretty good model for an interview with a climate skeptic. Instead of letting them have the last "balancing" word, let them speak, then get real scientists to dissect each of their pronouncements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/skeptic200705" >http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/skeptic200705</a></p>
<p>Well, this is a pretty good model for an interview with a climate skeptic. Instead of letting them have the last &#8220;balancing&#8221; word, let them speak, then get real scientists to dissect each of their pronouncements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjchip</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26316</link>
		<dc:creator>bjchip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26316</guid>
		<description>If they gave Rush an enema they could bury him in a shoebox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they gave Rush an enema they could bury him in a shoebox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjchip</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26315</link>
		<dc:creator>bjchip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26315</guid>
		<description>Cool... I read the National Review article in a short couple of seconds and spotted the author doing the usual right-wing trick of attributing fake arguments to fake people with fake attitudes so he could rubbish the idea of doing anything because the environmentalists don't all wear hair shirts.   

F-him and the horse he rode in on thank you very much.  I am AMAZINGLY tired of having the same BS half-truths waved about as if they were revelations from the almighty and reasons why business must go on as usual.  The same crap about the poor not being helped because money to help them will be diverted to the work we do to prevent or adapt to the climate troubles that ARE coming.  

Since we have helped the poor so poorly in the past, what makes anyone think that any aid they aren't going to get anyway is to be the source of the $$$ that we spend on improving our energy technologies?  

Sorry, I am having a "Bill-the-Cat" moment... 

respectfully 
BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8230; I read the National Review article in a short couple of seconds and spotted the author doing the usual right-wing trick of attributing fake arguments to fake people with fake attitudes so he could rubbish the idea of doing anything because the environmentalists don&#8217;t all wear hair shirts.   </p>
<p>F-him and the horse he rode in on thank you very much.  I am AMAZINGLY tired of having the same BS half-truths waved about as if they were revelations from the almighty and reasons why business must go on as usual.  The same crap about the poor not being helped because money to help them will be diverted to the work we do to prevent or adapt to the climate troubles that ARE coming.  </p>
<p>Since we have helped the poor so poorly in the past, what makes anyone think that any aid they aren&#8217;t going to get anyway is to be the source of the $$$ that we spend on improving our energy technologies?  </p>
<p>Sorry, I am having a &#8220;Bill-the-Cat&#8221; moment&#8230; </p>
<p>respectfully<br />
BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwinuke</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26313</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwinuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26313</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed the pice on Rush Limbaugh by James Walcott, tiled "Rush to Judgment" it includes l;ots of lovely little diatribes like this:

"For us non-dittoheads (that is, the unconverted), a more fitting memorial to Mount Rushbo might be a diorama of the environmental destruction that he did so much to enable in his multi-decade reign of denigration. Global warming's most popular denialist, talk radio's most imitated showman, conservatism's minister of disinformation, he has injected millions of semi-vacant American skulls with a cream filling of complacency that has helped thrust this country into the forefront of backward leadership. He has given Republican lawmakers the rhetorical cover fire to do nothing but snicker as the crisis emerged and impressed itself on the rest of the world. He conscripted concern for nature as just another weapon in the Culture Wars. May the grasses of his favorite golf courses go forever yellow and dust storms whip from the sand traps."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the pice on Rush Limbaugh by James Walcott, tiled &#8220;Rush to Judgment&#8221; it includes l;ots of lovely little diatribes like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;For us non-dittoheads (that is, the unconverted), a more fitting memorial to Mount Rushbo might be a diorama of the environmental destruction that he did so much to enable in his multi-decade reign of denigration. Global warming&#8217;s most popular denialist, talk radio&#8217;s most imitated showman, conservatism&#8217;s minister of disinformation, he has injected millions of semi-vacant American skulls with a cream filling of complacency that has helped thrust this country into the forefront of backward leadership. He has given Republican lawmakers the rhetorical cover fire to do nothing but snicker as the crisis emerged and impressed itself on the rest of the world. He conscripted concern for nature as just another weapon in the Culture Wars. May the grasses of his favorite golf courses go forever yellow and dust storms whip from the sand traps.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeymike</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26312</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeymike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/04/18/vanity-fair/#comment-26312</guid>
		<description>vf are still catering to their market. and why wouldn't they?

the fact that they're covering the issues (if not with depth, then at least in breadth) is a good thing. it sure beats features on manhatten apartment living or boob jobs, or whatever else it is they usually cover.

if we're talking about the impact of major print media then look no further than the &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/goinggreen/2007/index.html"&gt;recent green issue&lt;/a&gt; of fortune mag. it includes a piece on yvon chouinard - the original green biz guru (he's the perfect real world role model in my mind).

cheers
&lt;a href="http://shoppingfix.blogspot.com/"&gt;mike&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vf are still catering to their market. and why wouldn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>the fact that they&#8217;re covering the issues (if not with depth, then at least in breadth) is a good thing. it sure beats features on manhatten apartment living or boob jobs, or whatever else it is they usually cover.</p>
<p>if we&#8217;re talking about the impact of major print media then look no further than the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/goinggreen/2007/index.html">recent green issue</a> of fortune mag. it includes a piece on yvon chouinard - the original green biz guru (he&#8217;s the perfect real world role model in my mind).</p>
<p>cheers<br />
<a href="http://shoppingfix.blogspot.com/">mike</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
