<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Times vs STV in the Tron</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anjum</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>anjum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>i have a problem with the times taking up this crusade in the way it has.  the editor decides he has a cause, takes up prime front page space any day of the week he likes without having to pay for it, as well as an editorial, and hasn't quite fairly represented the situation (eg talk of the mess with counting the last dhb election results, without once mentioning that hcc are using a different company altogether which had no problem in delivering timely results the last time around).

it's not that there shouldn't be a referendum.  but hey, there are so many other causes out there that the deserve the kind of free publicity this one is suddenly getting - just because the editor has a bee in his bonnet about it.  does anyone else see a problem with this?  or is it just me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a problem with the times taking up this crusade in the way it has.  the editor decides he has a cause, takes up prime front page space any day of the week he likes without having to pay for it, as well as an editorial, and hasn&#8217;t quite fairly represented the situation (eg talk of the mess with counting the last dhb election results, without once mentioning that hcc are using a different company altogether which had no problem in delivering timely results the last time around).</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not that there shouldn&#8217;t be a referendum.  but hey, there are so many other causes out there that the deserve the kind of free publicity this one is suddenly getting - just because the editor has a bee in his bonnet about it.  does anyone else see a problem with this?  or is it just me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>Ah, sort of like Wet vs Dry referenda every three years... I miss those... Yeah great idea. Jeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sort of like Wet vs Dry referenda every three years&#8230; I miss those&#8230; Yeah great idea. Jeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/11/30/the-times-vs-stv-in-the-tron/#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I think it would probably be fairer to everyone if had defined periods for all local and national governments in which we voted for the types of representation we would like :)

Then we wouldn't have to waste time and resources with petitions to review electoral systems- we'd only need to worry about WHICH electoral systems were appropriate to put to vote ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think it would probably be fairer to everyone if had defined periods for all local and national governments in which we voted for the types of representation we would like <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Then we wouldn&#8217;t have to waste time and resources with petitions to review electoral systems- we&#8217;d only need to worry about WHICH electoral systems were appropriate to put to vote <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
