We don’t have a government!

by frog

Well, it seems like Winston is coming out with a position a day on his intentions after the election. I think his position is now as follows:

  • He will enter negotiations with the largest party (if it wants to), and offer it abstentions (or, if necessary, support) on confidence and supply motions.
  • He will not be prepared to provide such confidence and supply support (or abstention) if the Greens or Act are part of a coalition government with the largest party.

Now, what Winston hasn’t made clear is whether he’d be willing to provide confidence and supply support (or abstention) for a government that also had confidence and supply support from the Greens or Act. My guess is that he would be willing to do this, because the alternative is that there’s a real possibility that no-one could form a government and thus a fresh election would have to be called. Winston would not want this on his head.

Take the current make-up of Parliament in frogblog‘s averager:

Labour: 51 MPs
National: 49
Greens: 8
NZ First: 7
Maori: 4
United: 2
Progressives: 1
Total: 122 seats

This is a 122-seat Parliament, so 62 seats are needed for a majority. If Winston wasn’t prepared to support (or at least offer abstention on confidence and supply to) a Labour-led government that also had confidence and supply from the Greens, then a government simply couldn’t be formed on these numbers unless United were willing to come to the Labour/Green party. A National-led government would be able to muster 51 MPs (National plus United), which would be bolstered to 60 with NZ First. A Labour-led government without the Greens would be able to muster 54 MPs (Labour plus Progs plus United), or 61 with NZ First.

So, a recipe for chaos. My guess of what would happen in this scenario is that Peter Dunne, playing his “stability” card, would allow a Labour/Green Government to form. This would allow him to spend the next three years banging on about how when the country faced a second election in as many months, he looked beyond party politics and plumped for the country’s future. In light of this, I have changed the “most likely government” in our polling graphic to Labour/Green/United.

But, again: Who the Hell knows? What’s becoming clearer by the day is that Kiwis would be plain daft to allow Winston to call the shots after the election. His is a recipe for confusion, instability, even chaos. The message of both sides these last few days has to be: save the country from Winston! This country’s worst nightmare would be to wake up on Sunday morning with neither side – LPG or NU – having a clear majority. 1996 is starting to seem like a picnic.

Of course, with a slight move in public opinion in the Labour/Green favour would make all these machinations irrelevant. On current polling, the LPG team has 60 of 122 seats, so just a couple short of a majority. An election night result with, say, Labour on 42% and the Greens on 8% (not that far from our current polling averages) would render all these permutations irrelevant, because LPG would have a clean and clear majority. Those wanting a progressive government on Sunday need to use every ounce of their being to make this result a reality. Otherwise, we’re headed for weeks, maybe even months, of instability and then possibly even another election.

UPDATE: Again, I have edited the polling methodology page to update the assumptions on which the “most likely government” is chosen.

frog says

Published in Campaign by frog on Tue, September 13th, 2005   

Tags:

More posts by frog | more about frog