Brash’s last supper

by frog

Brash's last supper

An aspiring artist has sent in the above image, as his “take” on the Brash/Brethren links. I should emphasise that the image and the following explanation are the artist’s views, and not the Green Party’s. Disclaimer over, here’s his explanation of the image:

Note the deliberate similarities between Dali’s Last Supper original here and my re-interpretation, right down to the two kneeling figures in the foreground. Perhaps this was deliberate on their part, but I doubt it.

One of the things that really interests me is subliminal image manipulation. This was a good chance to put my hobby to some practical use. My Jesus is waving wads of cash – the Exclusive Brethren’s real God. Andrew Simmons (standing) plays Judas. A shrunken Peter Dunne head dangles from God the Brash’s middle finger off to the side – a puppet bit player in this drama.

I suspect that the Exclusive Brethren hate the Greens and Labour because these parties have women in leadership roles and stand for gender equality. The Exclusive Brethren have very backward, outdated views when it comes to women. As is the case with their Islamic fundamentalist counterparts, the world would be a better place without the Exclusive Brethren’s sexist views.

If you want to analyse this in more detail, a full-sized image is here.

UPDATE: Oh, and continuing the religious theme: Peter Dunne’s insistence that his isn’t a Christian party is rather at odds with what Mark Blumsky has to say about it. Mr Blumsky, remember, was United Future’s President. He has told Keith Ng:

I was surprised, when I got to the outer regions, [that] the mix of people in the party was different to the mix I had met in Wellington… I got a lot of emails that were quoting various scriptures… It wasn’t the social conservatism that scared me about United Future, it was the… some of them are very fanatical in how they see religion and politics tied up. So that’s why I [said] that I get scriptures or [bible] quotes sent through, and [they thought that] these should be driving, divining reasons for me to be doing things, because it was quoted in this Book of Jeremiah or whatever …

And they weren’t slow in letting me know their feelings. I realised if I was to stand tall as the President of United Future, I had to be more all-encompassing to the wider United Future group than just the Wellington team. So it was nothing to do with social conservatism, it was all to do with how they saw their religion in helping decide how they live their life.

Now, there’s nothing at all wrong with being a Christian party. It’s just a little curious that Peter Dunne always tries to deny it :)

frog says

Published in Campaign | Society & Culture by frog on Mon, September 12th, 2005   

Tags:

More posts by frog | more about frog