Tuesday August 9th, 2005. 11:04 am by frog
Posted in Campaign | Environment & Resource Management | tadpole 'toon | by frog | Tue, August 9th, 2005 |
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, August 9th, 2005 at 11:04 am and is filed under Campaign, Environment & Resource Management, tadpole 'toon.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can email this article to a friend. Printable version of this article.
You can leave a response, but trackbacks are not allowed.
August 10th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
Even funnier the claim from the clueless Bryan Sinclair, Special Advisor to Don Brash
is this…
“we would be happy to receive any material (from you or from anybody else) suggesting that the forms of alternative energy that are developed (and there are obviously a number of these, already in development, including solar powered road vehicles and hydrogen powered road vehicles, but two examples) will somehow reduce the need for proper roading.” (Sinclair, April 2005, email conversation)
National seem to be arguing that either a demand or supply reduction in oil would NOT reduce the requirement for building more roads it follows that if we do not build more roads, spaghetti junction will become gridlocked with hydrogen and/or solar powered vehicles. (as in the above toon)
Anyone that seriously thinks this could be the case needs psychological help.