<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Covering the Earth</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sock thief</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>sock thief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Well I would be concerned if any political party had the ability to tinker with TVNZ programming in-oder to advance its political agenda. I happen to believe that TV as a medium does not influence peoples' views on issues in the way that frog does but I think the principle of independent media is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I would be concerned if any political party had the ability to tinker with TVNZ programming in-oder to advance its political agenda. I happen to believe that TV as a medium does not influence peoples&#8217; views on issues in the way that frog does but I think the principle of independent media is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huskynut</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Huskynut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 22:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Sock Thief - remind me exactly what is so bad about "social engineering" again?  In times past (before the 80's I think), the social role of Government ran rather wider than negotiating free trade agreements and selling assets..

National radio seems to be a remarkable aberration.. if it didn't exist by historical accident, the odds of it being created from scratch are negligible.

Hard to believe TVNZ is remediable though, without starting again from scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sock Thief - remind me exactly what is so bad about &#8220;social engineering&#8221; again?  In times past (before the 80&#8217;s I think), the social role of Government ran rather wider than negotiating free trade agreements and selling assets..</p>
<p>National radio seems to be a remarkable aberration.. if it didn&#8217;t exist by historical accident, the odds of it being created from scratch are negligible.</p>
<p>Hard to believe TVNZ is remediable though, without starting again from scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sock thief</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>sock thief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/05/26/covering-the-earth/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>There's a number of problems with this thesis. The most basic being there is no evidence provided.

Your view is a good argument for privatising TVNZ so it does not beome a tool of Government social engineering. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a number of problems with this thesis. The most basic being there is no evidence provided.</p>
<p>Your view is a good argument for privatising TVNZ so it does not beome a tool of Government social engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
